Yes sir. It is.This thread is hilarious!
I downloaded the Bell County order. No penalties for non-compliance. Hiking, walking, running, cycling and outdoor activities allowed as long as you maintain distance. Not a lock down without permission order. Pretty much what I am seeing most places.
Not sure what they plan on doing about a business that does not comply. There is no penalty listed in the order.
If it gets to the point that you can not be outside without papers like some countries,,,,I can see this getting to be a very real problem with civil disobedience. I'll be one of them.
Civid 19 is a very real virus. From where and how is irrelevant.
The panic over it is made up over peoples feelings and fear.
It's sad when people die. It saddens me too from time to time. But it is a fact of what we call life. And anyone who has gambled knows, the only sure bet in what we call life is, you ain't getting out of it alive.
How the hell did America become so pompous as to think nobody should get sick or die?
When I have to have permission to leave my home,,,,yup, I'll be disobedient as hell.
Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Sorry, but assembling is outlawed as well.No, the right of the people to peaceably assemble for redress of grievances should be used. A polite, non-mob of people following some reasonable distance rules (hey, if there's 1000 people 6 feet apart from each other it will look a lot bigger!) and not coming if coughing or sneezing should start to get some attention. Carry signs specifically addressing the violation of Constitutional rights.
No it's not. The Bill of Rights supersedes the Penal Code... if this is truly a grievance, then the remedy for the grievance is a peaceful assembly to redress that.Sorry, but assembling is outlawed as well.
One is as illegal as the other given the county orders.
Personally, I don't think the orders are constitutional at all, but that is another argument. I could say the same thing about what I propose.No it's not. The Bill of Rights supersedes the Penal Code... if this is truly a grievance, then the remedy for the grievance is a peaceful assembly to redress that.
No it's not. The Bill of Rights supersedes the Penal Code...
The orders claim authority and under this: https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/GV/htm/GV.418.htmPersonally, I don't think the orders are constitutional at all, but that is another argument. I could say the same thing about what I propose.
According to the orders, both approaches are illegal.
UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 418.108, DALLAS COUNTY JUDGE CLAY JENKINS ORDERS:
Don't be shocked when they decide gun violence death is also a national disaster... this has to be stopped.Some Jabroni Brought the Coronavirus to a Kentucky “Coronavirus Party”
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/03/jabroni-kentucky-coronavirus-party.html
No arguing that.Just because the Government passes a law and claims the jurisdiction to something does not make it Constitutional.
There is NO "except" clause to in the Constitution. If there was, they could just declare an emergency anytime they want, over anything they want, for as long as they want, and there is effectively NO Constitution.
Who it is good for, how many, or why, is irrelevant. There is nothing in the Constitution that allows them to suspend it for any reason.
Sent by an idjit coffeeholic from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
The way to start the lawsuit - or test the order - is to follow the Texas Constitution and organize a formal, peaceful assembly and call the crisis of code vs. the Bill of Rights. That is what the Open Carry movement was all about. It needs to be done.No arguing that.
Yet the order is still out there. And will remain until a lawsuit is won.
Just be prepared to be arrested/ticketed/whatever for being part of a group that exceeds 10 (or 25 depending upon the county/city). Then you have a good basis for the lawsuit.The way to start the lawsuit - or test the order - is to follow the Texas Constitution and organize a formal, peaceful assembly and call the crisis of code vs. the Bill of Rights. That is what the Open Carry movement was all about. It needs to be done.
We always were, and that's why we were also armed. If you stayed 6-10 feet apart, they'd have a harder time saying you were spreading it to each other.Just be prepared to be arrested/ticketed/whatever for being part of a group that exceeds 10 (or 25 depending upon the county/city). Then you have a good basis for the lawsuit.
Sorry, but the public health issue (this is not yet a "Crisis") does not justify the mass hysteria response.
Isolate/protect the at-risk population. Don't wreck our country with a shotgun approach. This bug has little effect on the vast majority who catch it. Probably better off in the long if healthy folks catch it and get it over with.