At first I couldn't understand some of Mate's comments. But the more I think about, the more I keep coming up with things like:
1) A rabbit is rodent and a nuisance in most cases, so killing one even when not for food should be legal IMO...people use poisons and traps, why not a bludgeon like a hockey stick?
2) A felony is a serious charge.
3) I am assuming that if this was someone's pet rabbit that would have been mentioned.
So that leads me to think that this case is overblown.
Then there is this:
"after the “brutal mutilation” of the rabbit the suspect returned to the scene later in the evening, “this individual returned to the scene of the crime later that evening and also started to play with the rabbit with the hockey stick.”"
That's disturbing to me.
1) A rabbit is rodent and a nuisance in most cases, so killing one even when not for food should be legal IMO...people use poisons and traps, why not a bludgeon like a hockey stick?
2) A felony is a serious charge.
3) I am assuming that if this was someone's pet rabbit that would have been mentioned.
So that leads me to think that this case is overblown.
Then there is this:
"after the “brutal mutilation” of the rabbit the suspect returned to the scene later in the evening, “this individual returned to the scene of the crime later that evening and also started to play with the rabbit with the hockey stick.”"
That's disturbing to me.