Adrenaline is a hell of a drug.Guy is as dumb as a box of rocks.
Suspect Jackson was transported to DallasPD Headquarters where he wasadvised that he wasbeing detained under investigation and read the Miranda warning. Suspect Jackson stated that he understood his rights and waived them, consenting to an interview.
TPC9.42 is conditional upon TPC9.41 being fulfilled. 9.41 references one’s own personal property.
9.43 covers property of a third person. It says if 9.41 or 9.42 are met AND
Either The “good guy” needed to reasonable believe a theft has occurred OR
The good guy was asked to help, had a legal duty to help, or the land/proprety was under his care
THEN good guy had legal justification to use force or deadly force to protect someone else’s land or property.
Even with a strict interpretation, the question in my mind is (without having watched a video or anything) "is it reasonable for him to fear SBI?".Agree, lots of gray area in this case. Based on the available information and sticking to a strict interpretation of the elements of TPC 9 Subchapter C, I can see it going either way.
Immediately before suspect Jackson shot complainant, he was running towards the door and being hit by both witnesses, who then moved and were not near him when suspect shot and Killed complainant Betts.
So if he would have "shot back' at a cop he'd be GTG?In California, if Betts had returned fire, he would not be charged.
A man who fatally shot a Chevron station clerk during a robbery in Antioch, California, will not be facing murder charges, prosecutors for the case have said, arguing that because the suspect was shot at while fleeing, his shooting back would be considered self-defense
No murder charge for California robber who fatally shot gas station clerk
Prosecutors said that because the suspect was shot at while fleeing the scene, his shooting back would be considered self-defence.thepostmillennial.com
Wow, just wow. How fucked up do you have to be to justify that.In California, if Betts had returned fire, he would not be charged.
A man who fatally shot a Chevron station clerk during a robbery in Antioch, California, will not be facing murder charges, prosecutors for the case have said, arguing that because the suspect was shot at while fleeing, his shooting back would be considered self-defense
No murder charge for California robber who fatally shot gas station clerk
Prosecutors said that because the suspect was shot at while fleeing the scene, his shooting back would be considered self-defence.thepostmillennial.com
My work home.Oak Cliff is the armpit of the metroplex…
I worked at methodist Charlton (sp?) and lived near medical center for a spell in the late 2000s.Oak Cliff is the armpit of the metroplex…
I feared for the life of the two women. I want a lawyer before I answer more questions.According to search records, Jackson does not have a criminal history. He waited for police to arrive and agreed to an interview at headquarters.
Jackson said he was "concerned for the safety of the two women" and aimed for Betts’ leg. It’s unclear where Betts was hit.
The above was perhaps the biggest mistake this man could have made in this situation.
”I’m glad my client talked to the police” said no attorney, ever.
See Post #65Here is a case where it goes farther - clerk went after two robbers after they left. He opened fire on the thieves and they returned fired. The clerk was killed and, wait for it, they are not charging the thief who killed him with murder because it was "self defense."
I think there is an analysis of this on the law of self defense YouTubeIn California, if Betts had returned fire, he would not be charged.
A man who fatally shot a Chevron station clerk during a robbery in Antioch, California, will not be facing murder charges, prosecutors for the case have said, arguing that because the suspect was shot at while fleeing, his shooting back would be considered self-defense
No murder charge for California robber who fatally shot gas station clerk
Prosecutors said that because the suspect was shot at while fleeing the scene, his shooting back would be considered self-defence.thepostmillennial.com
What happens in california, needs to stay in california.See Post #65
That is a mandate I can support.What happens in california, needs to stay in california.
Someone hasn't been to Orla.And, Jasper the colon, with Vidor the anus !
You already shown that you have no idea. Say disparity of force then say "not deadly force"? How do you know? Disparity of force is male against female, healthy against the infirmed, one against many, a known trained combat expert against regular joe...........Dallas store customer facing murder charge for shooting unarmed robber
A Dallas man is charged with murder for shooting and killing an unarmed robber he believed was attacking two dollar store employees. After the shooting, the man stayed on the scene and spoke with police.www.fox4news.com
The man was punching a woman, (force disparity) but not deadly force, so not justified, right? even if it was during the commission of a felony (robbery)?
We can talk about this all day. I was raised to never hit a woman. Not to mention he was doing so while commiting a crime. Maybe this man robbing the store didn't deserve to lose his life however, I believe it was justified. Kevin Jackson should man should be set free.How many punches to kill a woman?
+ the key word ............robbery......armed or not...
If I were on the Jury he'd walk........
It may have been a political arrest......knowing he was justified but arresting him to avoid protests............