WTH!!! Phil Robertson suspended from Duck Dynasty....

[rsayloriii]

So, if a baker doesn't want to create/provide a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, no one's civil rights are violated?

That's not allowed!

 

[F350-6]

I wouldn't know Phil if he came and sat on my lap right now, but I sure am glad that everyone's talking about him and what he said instead of Miley Cyrus or Justin Bieber.

 

[Younggun]

Is that a QUOTE? Or a fabrication, not what I said and you know it, honestly is not one of your strong suits...


I never said I am an employer of gay people or did I say if you get fired your rights have been infringed upon.

How long before you play the race card as your emotions and failure to be honest has eclipsed your grip on reality. Nothing more to say...

You are implying just that. You say his getting fired for what he said violated his rights. The only other option would be if A&E could not fire him for that. In that case they would be keeping him employed against their wishes. FORCED TO KEEP HIM EMPLOYED!

We are very much in touch with reality, you are trying to warp it because the reality is, Phil's right to free speech was NOT violated and A&E did something that made you feel butthurt. You through out some rabble about the first amendment and now you can't admit that it had nothing to do with the first amendment.

 

[Kenny D]

After reading the latest breaking news , the Robertson family has made an official statement. Without directly quoting, they basically said that they can not foresee the show continuing without Phil.


Sent from my Sig

 

[breakingcontact]

After reading the latest breaking news , the Robertson family has made an official statement. Without directly quoting, they basically said that they can not foresee the show continuing without Phil.


Sent from my Sig

They need to go to a different network.

 

[cbigclarke]

CMT

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

 

[breakingcontact]

CMT

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk

That was my first choice.

 

[reddog]

I don't watch TV for the most part, can't get it here with out spending $ I'd rather spend on something else, but I sure do get a kick out of what happens about TV. I could give a f'k about reality TV no matter what it's about, then to have this come up and get 11 pages of discontent here A&E, Arts and Entertainment, bunch of limp wristed no goods anyhow, who gives a crap. A&E don't like it, too bad, I hope DD has enough brass to tell them to shove it. Had to get my $.02 worth in, everyone else has...

 

[Moonpie]

Ahhhh......the voices for tolerance sound kinda intolerant.

 

[jrbfishn]

It's not intolerance, it's extreme tolerance of opposing opinions,, I think.
Personally, can't figure out why anyone puts any importance at all on what some celebrity on tv thinks. If there opinion means that much just because they are on TV, You ain't think in much on Your own anyway

from an non-recovering coffeeholic

 

[hellishhorses]

So, if a baker doesn't want to create/provide a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, no one's civil rights are violated?

No.

 

[ZX9RCAM]

Judge orders baker to serve gay couples despite his religious beliefs | Fox News

 

[Younggun]

No.

Agreed.

 

[Vaquero]

I'm with Phil.

 

[TheCytochromeC]

Judge orders baker to serve gay couples despite his religious beliefs | Fox News

LOL it's as though I'd say, Mr. Muslim butcher, I'll have a Boston Butt and a slab of bacon. No? WHAT AN INJUSTICE!!!

 

[TheDan]

How long before you play the race card as your emotions and failure to be honest has eclipsed your grip on reality.

lol, what? That doesn't even make sense.

Nothing more to say...

Agreed... You'll never even try to understand the facts because you're too emotionally engaged with your own opinion.

So, if a baker doesn't want to create/provide a wedding cake for a same-sex couple, no one's civil rights are violated?

of course not

Judge orders baker to serve gay couples despite his religious beliefs | Fox News

...and that's bullshit goverment regulation. A bussiness owner should have the right to serve who they wish or not. The market will decide if that bussiness should continue or not. Unfortunately the government, at all levels, meddles in the market entirely too much.

 

[Shorts]

Business owners should just flat out refuse with a no instead of adding an explanation. At the very least there's nothing to use against them and it would just be suspicions.

 

[hellishhorses]

...and that's bullshit goverment regulation. A bussiness owner should have the right to serve who they wish or not. The market will decide if that bussiness should continue or not. Unfortunately the government, at all levels, meddles in the market entirely too much.

Yep. If I wanted to start a business that catered to black, lesbian, jewish women I should be free to do just that. And the market is free to run my business into the ground. If the market deems it viable, and thus, makes it successful — government should keep their greasy little noses out.

 

[Southpaw]

Yep. If I wanted to start a business that catered to black, lesbian, jewish women I should be free to do just that. And the market is free to run my business into the ground. If the market deems it viable, and thus, makes it successful — government should keep their greasy little noses out.

They would! As long as you are not catering to white, straight, Christian males you are good.

 

[hellishhorses]

They would! As long as you are not catering to white, straight, Christian males you are good.

Ed Zachary! The people screaming the loudest for tolerance are often the least tolerant people you'll meet.