Judge rules illegal alien has 2A rights.
- Thread starter Haystack
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
A good percentage of them do not even show up and we have to put detainers on them. Problem is most of them reside in sanctuary jurisdictions and will not honor our detainers especially in States like California, New York, Illinois, and MA.
Of course.
The entire discussion surrounding asylum is meant to delay any legal process that could result in them being forced to leave the country, period. Nobody believes these people are actual refugees. Not our government, not the people crossing the border, and not the people who are paying for the “caravans” to come here. If things were so bad in their country that they were forced to flee, they wouldn’t be leaving their wives and kids behind.
You brought up another great point. Marriage fraud is another problem in this issue. many of these people marry US citizens but hid their past marriage until they complete their process and wait several years to be removed from conditional to permanent status. then they divorce the petitioner spouse and wait several months to petition for their real spouses and family to come. I caught alot of these types during my 22 years with no regrets.
Paul Saver
Active Member
One could argue there is a national security element to be considered here. Millions of people from other countries have poured over the border, many of them young men of fighting age. Organize them, arm them, and let them stand behind the 2A, and you have a problem.
Read more at Bearing Arms blog.
Moderate conservatives like me believe in upholding the Second Amendment and protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens to own firearms, but the issue of extending these rights to individuals who have entered the country illegally presents a complex challenge.
It is essential to recognize that the Second Amendment is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution, intended to protect the individual’s right to self-defense and ensure the security of a free state. While this right should be safeguarded, it is crucial to consider the implications of extending this protection to individuals who are in the country unlawfully. They are already breaking laws by being here illegally, and it’s the law-abiding citizens who have the rights under the Constitution.
Moderate conservatives like me believe in upholding the Second Amendment and protecting the rights of law-abiding citizens to own firearms, but the issue of extending these rights to individuals who have entered the country illegally presents a complex challenge.
It is essential to recognize that the Second Amendment is a fundamental right enshrined in the Constitution, intended to protect the individual’s right to self-defense and ensure the security of a free state. While this right should be safeguarded, it is crucial to consider the implications of extending this protection to individuals who are in the country unlawfully. They are already breaking laws by being here illegally, and it’s the law-abiding citizens who have the rights under the Constitution.
It says "the right of the people." Most, maybe all, of the various attempts to bypass the Constitution have included an attempt to exclude a person from "the people". If you allow one exception, you allow another. Excluding them now allows excluding you then.
"They might do something bad" is what the enemy says. Freedom is freedom; not freedom is serfdom at best.
Do not be distracted from the need to protect and defend the Constitution. Many of us here have sworn that oath. Don't let the enemy suggest otherwise.
"They might do something bad" is what the enemy says. Freedom is freedom; not freedom is serfdom at best.
Do not be distracted from the need to protect and defend the Constitution. Many of us here have sworn that oath. Don't let the enemy suggest otherwise.
No. It's "the people". I think that's why the drafters used that language. If the rights are God-given, as the founders said, and as I believe, then no human fiddling can abridge them.
We can and should make laws about harmful uses; not about possession.
Exactly. If the Founding Fathers intended it to only apply to US citizens, it would have read "the right of citizens to keep and bear Arms..."
I guess some don't understand that even illegal aliens have inalienable rights!
Undocumented Immigrants have Constitutional Rights too - The Arkansas Journal of Social Change and Public Service - UA Little Rock
By: Aisosa Osaretin Disclaimer: The views expressed in this post are those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect views of the Journal,… Continue reading→
And a voter registration card already filled out in English which they don't understand! Instructed to just drop it in the box and they will take care of it for you!
