As long as the other party is continuing to use or attempting to use force. Watching all 3 videos, it does not appear that the woman he shoved is involved in the deadly force attack on the shooter. He was mobbed and struck multiple times with a skateboard. I am of the opinion that if every single one of the attackers caught a round, they would all be justified.So, let me get this right, even if you assault someone first, as long as you are running away, then you can shoot and claim self defense?
Yeah, try this one.I didn't watch all the videos, but it didn't appear to me that he was in the wrong to use a firearm in self defense
Yeah, try this one.
https://mobile.twitter.com/SALIDmag/status/1272962710989307909?ref_src=twsrc^tfw
Edit - reading fail on my part. Failed to see the N’T on “did” oops
The post I quoted I mis read. I read it as “It DID appear to be wrong to use his gun” reading fail on my partThat video, by itself, shows that it would be a slam dunk self defense.
Even if I started yelling at the protestors, if they came at me in multiples while I was retreating and struck me several times then used a skate board for aggravated assault, I would have done the same thing and fired. It sounds like he even tried to use non-lethal, and utilized pepper spray.
That will depend on NM law. In Texas it would not be a problem since he had clearly tried to run away and break from the confrontation.I'm still questioning, how the fact that he initiated the confrontation, will come in to play.
I'm afraid this will continue to happen as long as there are butt-holes who want to erase our history. I have an great uncle who fought on the Confederate side and was wounded at the battle of Shiloh. We have a family cemetery that is listed with a Texas Historical Society and a monument plaque stating this.
Would I defend this, yes. I want my kids, grand-kids etc, etc, to know and be proud of what their ancestors did for our great country.
You do realize that he threw a woman to the ground prior to being chased, correct?
No, I didn't see that part of the video. Why did he do it though? Did she touch him first? I did not say he didn't do anything to warrant the crowd's anger, just that I don't fault him for using his weapon in self defense.You do realize that he threw a woman to the ground prior to being chased, correct?
You can't shoot them if they chase you. You can shoot them if you clearly disengage and they create a new situation in which deadly force would be authorized.
In this situation the shooter was an idiot for getting involved and assaulting people. However, he clearly tried to leave and even showed that he had a weapon. The next idiot decided to attack anyway and won a prize.