Sig 9mms are better than Glock 9mms, prove me wrong!

[zackmars]

Ever type out a detailed post, then say why bother?

I just turn them into .30sc posts

 

[leVieux]

<>

Well, since you asked; the MARKET decides this, not me nor you.

<>

 

[General Zod]

I just turn them into .30sc posts

Why bother?

 

[zackmars]

Why bother?

A simple man asks why both...

Aw i give up. .30 sc is great. Its the best round ever made this past 20440 years.

 

[General Zod]

A simple man asks why both...

Aw i give up. .30 sc is great. Its the best round ever made this past 20440 years.

Ah, the ramblings of a simple man...

 

[zackmars]

Ah, the ramblings of a simple man...

That reminds me of a led zeppelin song, an Allman brothers band song, and a lynyrd skynyrd song.

Anyways as i was saying, .30 sc is the best round.

 

[General Zod]

Anyways as i was saying, .30 sc is the best round.

...for carrying a weak round and probably being made fun of on the range, sure.

 

[Younggun]

Because
CAG/The Unit/SOCOM/SFOD-D/JSOC/Delta/Seal Team 6/SOF/Etc… all traded in their Sigs and 1911’s for Glocks.

I could list a number of other agencies from Texas DPS and others that got rid of their Sig P series from the P220’s to P226’s, but the above is enough to show that the Glock is far superior than the Sig in real world use vs those that just carry a side arm made by Sig, like most of the US Military and some police departments.

At work, the ones who carry Sig M17/18’s are the taskers on the ground. The ones with Glocks are going out doing the actual missions.

View attachment 437445

Thank you for proving that 5.56 is the superior rifle cartridge and 9mm is the superior cartridge for handguns.

Will stop a lot of future debates.

 

[CavCop]

Thank you for proving that 5.56 is the superior rifle cartridge and 9mm is the superior cartridge for handguns.

Will stop a lot of future debates.

But the 7.62 NATO (.308) is the most effective round, be it in a bolt action sniper rifle (M24), semi auto counter sniper rifle (M110A1), battle rifle M14/21), or machine gun (M240B). The 5.56 is just pea shooter that fuelers, mechanics, clerks, cooks, and others carry. I mean the 5.56 was made for the Air Force to have light rifle, with no recoil, because they were not strong enough for a .308… like the SEAL’s with their M60E4’s and Mk48’s in 7.62. You can’t spell Wimp, without an MP, and the weakest MP’s have 5.56 M249 SAW’s not M240’s or M134’s in 7.62 like direct action units.

(This like a tolling threat right?…).

 

[Lonesome Dove]

Baloney. You’d own several.

Absolutely Not.

 

[ItzGene]

I had a P365 and I shot it fine until I started doing timed defensive drill. Then it all went to garbage! Two trainers told me the gun was too small for me. When I replied I wanted a small gun they handed me a Glock 26 with a pinky finger extension. Instantly my shooting improved 100% on the spot! I also had a 320 and started IDPA shooting. When I told them I was going to use a 320 they asked me if I had any experience with holsters and 320’s. I said no, they said get a Glock! I did.

 

[69ChevelleLSX]

p226 legion trumps all glocks
p210 trumps all glocks
A plastic M17 trumps all glocks
Sig 1911’s Trump all glocks
A Broken metal gun trumps all glocks.

Glock fan boys are worse the 6.5 creedmoor fan boys.
I own quite a few Glocks they cycle well, but plastic is for Barbie dolls not firearms.

 

[Wudidiz]

Designed to carry like a .380 and almost mimic a 9mm, the .30 Super Carry was actually designed by Federal Premium as a cartridge for ladies and transsexuals. The .30sc solves a non-existant problem. It does, however, attract those who think everything new is necessarily better.

 

[WAA]

Designed to carry like a .380 and almost mimic a 9mm, the .30 Super Carry was actually designed by Federal Premium as a cartridge for ladies and transsexuals. The .30sc solves a non-existant problem. It does, however, attract those who think everything new is necessarily better.

And?

 

[Wudidiz]

And?

That

 

[Sasquatch]

But the 7.62 NATO (.308) is the most effective round, be it in a bolt action sniper rifle (M24), semi auto counter sniper rifle (M110A1), battle rifle M14/21), or machine gun (M240B). The 5.56 is just pea shooter that fuelers, mechanics, clerks, cooks, and others carry. I mean the 5.56 was made for the Air Force to have light rifle, with no recoil, because they were not strong enough for a .308… like the SEAL’s with their M60E4’s and Mk48’s in 7.62. You can’t spell Wimp, without an MP, and the weakest MP’s have 5.56 M249 SAW’s not M240’s or M134’s in 7.62 like direct action units.

(This like a tolling threat right?…).

I've got a friend who is DPS who is really disappointed with the 9mm P320 DPS switched to, from the .357 Sig chambered 226. He bought his old service pistol when they transitioned to the new one. Anecdotally, he said they have experienced poorer performance in actual shootings with the 9mm over the .357s because they were originally supposed to go with a specific bonded bullet, but when the guns were switched they switched duty loads at the last minute to a cheaper, less performing round. Penetration through auto glass and door skins has not been as good. He didn't know how true it was, but he said he's heard ruminations about DPS on the hunt for a replacement for both the P320 and the 9x19.

 

[msharley]

I've got a friend who is DPS who is really disappointed with the 9mm P320 DPS switched to, from the .357 Sig chambered 226. He bought his old service pistol when they transitioned to the new one. Anecdotally, he said they have experienced poorer performance in actual shootings with the 9mm over the .357s because they were originally supposed to go with a specific bonded bullet, but when the guns were switched they switched duty loads at the last minute to a cheaper, less performing round. Penetration through auto glass and door skins has not been as good. He didn't know how true it was, but he said he's heard ruminations about DPS on the hunt for a replacement for both the P320 and the 9x19.

The Model 610. Cure what ails ya!

 

[paknheat]

I've got a friend who is DPS who is really disappointed with the 9mm P320 DPS switched to, from the .357 Sig chambered 226. He bought his old service pistol when they transitioned to the new one. Anecdotally, he said they have experienced poorer performance in actual shootings with the 9mm over the .357s because they were originally supposed to go with a specific bonded bullet, but when the guns were switched they switched duty loads at the last minute to a cheaper, less performing round. Penetration through auto glass and door skins has not been as good. He didn't know how true it was, but he said he's heard ruminations about DPS on the hunt for a replacement for both the P320 and the 9x19.

Yup, leave it to Austin to fix what wasn’t broken in the first place.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Lonesome Dove]

And?

He's just saying how it is for those who don't know.

 

[Sasquatch]

Yup, leave it to Austin to fix what wasn’t broken in the first place.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The talk I heard was of M&P's in .40 or .45 but who knows. Could be they go to another 9mm because money talks. I think they'd wind up with new guns anyway, as they've started to phase in optics and weapon lights and their older guns were not optic cut.