Got some news for you, both sides were POS. It was a group effort.
Davetex how right you are!
Got some news for you, both sides were POS. It was a group effort.
Got some news for you, both sides were POS. It was a group effort.
One side committed murder.
Is punching Nazis (anyone to their right) okay? Punching today, killing tomorrow.But you can legally murder them if they do? Thats the argument of the dictator.
I care about Nazis about as much as I care about Antifa. The bill of rights protects protesting, yes, but it doesn't protect those looking for a fight. Both sides came looking for a fight, that's not a protest, that's a riot and the bill of rights does not protect rioting.Tens of thousands of people protested those racist pieces of shit. You think people protesting Nazis are antiAmerican? The ghosts of Patton, Eisenhower, and my grandad's would like to have a word...
All I can say is if I went to a protest and a riot broke out, if I stayed knowing that, whatever happens to me is on me.Over time I've come to reason that my initial defense of the driver was erroneous.
I'll also say that being a "nazi" as some have labeled him should not really be relevant. The only relevant is his motivation for driving down that street at high speed.
And lastly, how the hell can certain people argue about whether or not nazis or socialist are a bigger threat? Do we not know what the NAZI party was? "National Socialist German Workers" party.
I figured after this much time some of the hyperbole could die down and maybe some rational thought could go in to some of these posts. Instead we are still stuck on "antifa wanted a fight" or "nazis need to go to jail".
Do we even know if everyone in that group was Antifa, or just some snowflake college retards wanting to argue with some alt right retards?
Both sides came looking for a fight, that's not a protest, that's a riot and the bill of rights does not protect rioting.
And those clubs they had were for ...... effect?False. The rally organizers had a permit to march. According to an Independent Review, the Charlottesville Chief of Police told his Officers to stand down an let the Communists attack the marchers...
https://news.vice.com/story/charlot...ops-to-let-them-fight-when-nazis-came-to-town
Have some respect for the U.S. Constitution. Please stop repeating the lies of your Fake News outlets.
False. The rally organizers had a permit to march. According to an Independent Review, the Charlottesville Chief of Police told his Officers to stand down an let the Communists attack the marchers...
https://news.vice.com/story/charlot...ops-to-let-them-fight-when-nazis-came-to-town
Have some respect for the U.S. Constitution. Please stop repeating the lies of your Fake News outlets.
Did you actually read the independent review you linked?
No. What page tells you that the Communists did not show up to a permitted rally and attack the First Amendment marchers?
Firstly, how about weave intellectually honest
The rally organizers had a permit to march. According to the Review, the Charlottesville Chief of Police told his Officers to stand down and let the Communists attack the marchers...
https://news.vice.com/story/charlot...ops-to-let-them-fight-when-nazis-came-to-town
The Chief knew he could circumvent the Marchers legal permit if he let the Communist Antifa attack the permit holders, which is exactly what he did.
I wish you would support the U.S. Constitution instead of struggling to find excuses for Marxists who want to destroy America.
The constitution protects peaceful protest. The people who came to the permitted event acted with physical aggression against the counter protestors.
I took your advice and read more of the report than just the part about the Police Chief ordering a stand-down so he could declare it an unlawful assembly instead of protecting the free speech marchers from being attacked by Antifa Communists.
You cherry-picked text containing instances when marchers hit counter-protesters and left out the paragraphs about how the Communists blocked streets and attacked Police. You left out the parts describing how they stopped the Unite The Right marchers from entering the venue and exiting the venue, and all other instances of them attacking.
Very dishonest.
"Police Chief ordering a stand-down so he could declare it an unlawful assembly instead of protecting the free speech marchers", that is your opinion. It's not stated as a finding of the review.