I think he did like annoying would do and paid the taxes required.
As much as Bernie is a goofball, there is nothing extraordinarily hypocritical about that answer.
He’s also told leftist who criticize him for his wealth to write a best selling book and they can be wealthy too.
Don’t like him. Don’t support him. But I can find plenty of criticisms without reaching for sound bites of him admitting he won’t pay taxes that he isn’t required to pay.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's a full-on facepalm reply, YG.I think he did like annoying would do and paid the taxes required.
As much as Bernie is a goofball, there is nothing extraordinarily hypocritical about that answer.
He’s also told leftist who criticize him for his wealth to write a best selling book and they can be wealthy too.
Don’t like him. Don’t support him. But I can find plenty of criticisms without reaching for sound bites of him admitting he won’t pay taxes that he isn’t required to pay.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Let me clear that up for you. "I can't figure out how to crawfish out of a really stupid post."I believe it’s a little more nuanced than that, but don’t think it’s worth the debate. And I don’t want to get in to a position where I feel like I’m on the edge of defending the economic positions of Bernie Sanders
Easy, you make a donation to the US Treasury and mail it in.I have no clue but how do you pay taxes that you don't owe ?
Let me clear that up for you. "I can't figure out how to crawfish out of a really stupid post."
You said "As much as Bernie is a goofball, there is nothing extraordinarily hypocritical about that answer."No, not even close.
Read my post again. I said “extraordinarily hypocritical”. I chose my words for a reason.
You said "As much as Bernie is a goofball, there is nothing extraordinarily hypocritical about that answer."
That's what you said, verbatim. There absolutely IS something extraordinarily hypocritical about Sanders advocating, suggesting, and lobbying for something he quite obviously does not agree with doing himself. When asked if he followed his Socialist ideals by proactively 'redistributing' his capital gains, he summarily rebuffed the interviewer. Pretty much the definition of hypocritical. Seems pretty clear he believes Socialism is for the masses, not those in political power. Par for the course, if history has taught us anything at all about Socialism.
No need. You already know the answer.Did they ask him if he is on Medicare or the Cadillac Health care plan senators get.
Easy, you make a donation to the US Treasury and mail it in.
https://fiscal.treasury.gov/public/gifts-to-government.html
No deduction, sorry. US Treasury is not a registered charity.So he can have even a bigger tax deduction next year
Wow. That's a big ol' can of WTF. Maybe I am getting old, because in my world when you talk the talk, you better walk the walk. Is it safe to say you're cool with talking out of both sides of your mouth being not only "typical human" behavior but is also somehow acceptable?.. but feel it falls well within the bounds of typical human hypocrisy and isn’t newsworthy...