'Fixed that for ya'!!thats the way it is supposed to be, so it can be argued in court so the attorneys can buy new cars for their kids.
No. Like not ensuring the gun was completely out of sight.you mean like trying to stay alive?
Citizens' RIGHTS to self-defense should never be subjugated to anyone's "property rights" ! Nor to irrational fears of bureaucrats !
leVieux
Do I need to watch the video to know why? If so, I can wait till I get home.... I learned to carry ONLY a revolver while in AZ. ...
leVieux
I did not read that in what was said. If someone is on your property and is armed, I would think you have the right to ask them to leave, not necessarily the right to disarm. One can ask what one wants, but the bottom line is if they are on private property, they can be asked to leave by the owner, etc.So a property owner shouldn't have any rights according to you?
Novel idea.
I did not read that in what was said. If someone is on your property and is armed, I would think you have the right to ask them to leave, not necessarily the right to disarm. One can ask what one wants, but the bottom line is if they are on private property, they can be asked to leave by the owner, etc.
Agreed.
The places I just retired from specified in the employee manual, no firearms on the premises including the parking lot. Considered a Federal facility. I parked off premises, pistol in a locked, cabled pistol vault. When there’s a will . . .
Do I need to watch the video to know why? If so, I can wait till I get home.
The places I just retired from specified in the employee manual, no firearms on the premises including the parking lot. Considered a Federal facility. I parked off premises, pistol in a locked, cabled pistol vault. When there’s a will . . .
That might be his opinion, but he is incorrect!The Attorney told us that under AZ Law, any a.d. is a felony, one year+ in prison. That is "ACCIDENTAL Discharge", even if it does no harm to anyone or anything !
leVieux