Many good things are highly debatable, but it is impossible to conclude it is not a good cause unless someone is pro-rashist...Whether or not it’s going to a good cause is highly debatable.
And I disagree.Here's the deal bro...
Ukriane getting a bunch of our equipment and some of our money isn't the problem it is at most a symptom. You repeatedly bitching using ignorant hyperbole is a just as much of a problem as the US sending our tax dollars abroad.
I am 100% for the USA sending tech and equipment for free or a large discount. I don't like our tax dollars leaving our shore, but that ship has sailed and at least it is going to a good cause. The value of the equipment and cash is maximized by going to Ukraine who is fighting to remain free and taking real, concrete steps to clean out corruption.
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
You’re about as far off as Ukraines missile that landed in Poland, but you’re entitled to your opinion.Many good things are highly debatable, but it is impossible to conclude it is not a good cause unless someone is pro-rashist...
There is absolutely no justification for russia's invasion, therefore ANY opposition to that invasion, particularly in providing armaments or making them available is a good cause.
I saw the apartments and churches that had been bombed. I walked streets away from any justifiable military target that were cratered. I spoke the Ukrainians who had relatives killed...
Our support for Ukriane is 100% as justified as WWII and if russia is allowed to continue, we will be watching the start of WWIII as russia grows bolder with our inaction just as Germany did in 1938 and 1939...
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
And that's why you're wrongAnd I disagree.
How many times did that happen?You’re about as far off as Ukraines missile that landed in Poland, but you’re entitled to your opinion.
If that’s what you got out of my post then your cluelessness makes much more sense now.How many times did that happen?
There is a difference between someone who made a mistake or had a car malfunction and gets into a crash, vs someone ramming any car they see...
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
Anything butAnd that's why you're wrong
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
Then what was your point other than to equate A SINGLE errant missile with a distinct pattern of intentional destuction...If that’s what you got out of my post then your cluelessness makes much more sense now.
What are the odds of Russia some how getting their hands on the US equipment left in Afghanistan? That would be some shite if they started using it against the UkrainesYeah, then we'll abandon billions of dollars worth of shiny new small arms and vehicles for them to use to spread their terror more. Frankly, I'd rather voluntarily give old stuff to Ukraine to use against Russia than do a half-assed, idiotic bug-out and give new stuff to the Taliban to use against whoever they decide to try to kill next.
Supposedly they've been trying to buy it.What are the odds of Russia some how getting their hands on the US equipment left in Afghanistan? That would be some shite if they started using it against the Ukraines
Not surprised...Supposedly they've been trying to buy it.
Not surprised...
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
lol. Maybe you need to read that post a second time. I wasn’t trying to equate it to anything.Then what was your point other than to equate A SINGLE errant missile with a distinct pattern of intentional destuction...
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
Why would they want to do that?Supposedly they've been trying to buy it.
You are a dealer in obfuscation, if I am wrong present some facts, not some nonsense.lol. Maybe you need to read that post a second time. I wasn’t trying to equate it to anything.
Can you even read?Why would they want to do that?
It's obsolete.
We give it away at no cost whatsoever I am told.
Why would they want to do that?
It's obsolete.
We give it away at no cost whatsoever I am told.