Um.....if the condemned died, how was it botched?
I haven't read much about the latest successful execution except for the typical reports from the leftist MSM. Was the condemned man aware of what was going on or was he unconscious? If he was unconscious, so what. Sapper's Third Axiom: "Never Expend More Grief on the Murderer than one Spends on the Victim."You referring to the most recent one where the guy took 2 hours to die?
Im not for torturing people to death. Im also not for making it look like a medical procedure.
Im fine with hanging or firing squad.
I can see that this thread is going to be entertaining.
How about using the method the condemned used?
Cruel and unusual? Apparently they didn't care. Why should we?
I haven't read much about the latest successful execution except for the typical reports from the leftist MSM. Was the condemned man aware of what was going on or was he unconscious? If he was unconscious, so what. Sapper's Third Axiom: "Never Expend More Grief on the Murderer than one Spends on the Victim."
The pharmaceutical companies want to play silly political games with the medications used in executions. I suspect the ammunition manufacturers would have no such qualms. They might even pay the states for naming rights to the execution venues. Win-win.
Some things the general public doesn't need to know. There was a trial and conviction, appeals (which are another matter) were exhausted and it is TDCJ's obligation to carry out the execution as court ordered.Right. Thats what is causing most of these issues. Texas uses a "compounding pharmacy" to make their drugs and won't say what they are using.