I'm not sure if I agree with that. I would be willing to bet that most glock 21 pistols are putting out groups that would stack up well against any 1911(examples below). I think that the perception that a 1911 is more accurate than a glock isn't based on the accuracy of the pistol, but the ease in a shooter achieving that accuracy. The 1911 trigger is the most obvious example of this.
In terms of plastic wonders standing out, reliability is one place, but it is hard to overlook capacity.
Well...I was being a little facetious with my response. It's the canned response you'll get from just about every 1911 die-hard out there. To be honest, I just recently got into 1911's and previously owned nothing but polymer guns. I like the platform, even amidst the perceived or experienced finiky-ness. I've had the experience to handle a few different 1911's, and only one gave me shit. The small carry (3") barrel. But that was to be expected given that the original design was for a 5". The other ones (all were govt or commander sized) gave no issues ever, even during break-in.
My glocks I could shoot quite well, but to be honest all I ever used was 9mm. I'm thinking hard about going back to a 19 (and an additional 21) setup...but I've read the 21 is pretty horrible beyond 7-10 yards. Hell even Hickock (see YouTube) was havin trouble shooting it at distance! Lol
I'll concede the capacity point, when you concede the pistol whipping advantage.
Last edited: