Nothing personal, but gracious I hope you are not right...
Me too, but I’m a realist and I don’t see R’s having any sacred cows anymore and the Ds brought a steamroller to the current session.
Nothing personal, but gracious I hope you are not right...
The Founders were wary of federal power and I am weary of federal power.Our Founders, however, were extremely wary of federal power and thus created a number of checks and balances to counter it. One of them was the ability by the states to “nullify” federal laws and even Supreme Court decisions. As most conservatives know, nullification is when a State decides to not abide by a federal law, regulation or even a Federal court ruling by simply refusing to enforce it. This concept is rooted in the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution, which plainly states that if the states, who are the creators of the federal government, have not specifically given them authority, that authority rests with the states and the people of the state:
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Over the last 150 years or so, liberal legislators and judges have violated the Tenth Amendment by illegally expanding the scope and power of the federal government. We know that Federal power is limited because such powers were actually “enumerated” or listed in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution and include actions such as “To lay and collect taxes,” “coin money,” and “raise and support Armies.” The federal government was not given any role in education, health, welfare, transportation, energy, or even with maintaining secure borders. All those issues were left up to the states to decide. If our founders wanted to expand the federal government into every area of our life, they would not have specifically listed the very few powers they granted it.
States dont get a vote.
This will pass easily, 8 Republicans voted for it in the House.
Well, yes.
Details, please.....It is more about what he hasn’t done that she would have. As bad as Cornyn is, he is 1000x better than her
You mean the people who will wear a useless piece of cloth across their face?Registration worked out so well in Canada, that they abolished that law because no one was registering their stuff.
If Canadians reacted with that level of defiance, how do you think Americans will react?
What kind of holster is available for it?I see you bought one of those new upside down guns!
What kind of holster is available for it?
Well, well, well. More "laws for thee but not for me" crap today:
Secret Service reportedly got involved in bizarre gun case involving Hunter Biden
The Secret Service intervened in an investigation into a 2018 incident involving Hunter Biden and his girlfriend at the time — his former sister-in-law, Hallie — in which she took his g…nypost.com
There would be no "may have", if it were thee or me...Hunter Biden Reportedly Violated Federal Law by Lying on Background Check
Hunter Biden may have committed a felony offense by lying on a background check before purchasing a gun, Politico reported on Thursday. Biden answered “no” in response to the question “Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any...www.yahoo.com
NEWS ALERT: Our dear leader is about to address the nation (1:15PM ET, scheduled). Newsmax says "he will take some tough questions". Yeah, I am expecting the likes of "what is your favorite flavor of ice cream?"