How NOT to carry concealed

[majormadmax]

First, with all the folks on this board, is there no one near this place that can confirm that there is a 30.06 sign or not? I don't care what the restaurant owner says, I've heard lots of people claim to know the law when in reality they don't.

Secondly, there is always a grand jury following a shooting. It is an investigative process tasked with seeking information, evaluating allegations and evidence, and determining whether criminal charges are warranted.

Cheers! M2

 

[London]

Thanks for the clarification!

 

[45tex]

I like that restaurant

 

[ROGER4314]

The news in Houston showed a picture of the derringer or A derringer while doing that story. The one they showed looked like a Bond .410/45.

Flash

 

[OldGringo]

Video account I saw the reporter had the cameraman pan from posting to posting on the facase as she read each olud and there was clearly not a 30.06 posted.

 

[mike4045]

Another one proves my point that any idiot can carry. Doesn't mean they should. I support the right to carry, it is just too easy for someone to get a license. I quit working with civilians, because too many think the right to carry means they should. For the most part most they have little to no training before or after. I seen many people carrying in public and you could see the outline of the gun. I hope they make an example of him for endangering the public. You can't make some people understand that they are responsible for every round that comes out of the gun. Whether they meant to do it or not. Hit what you aim at or do not carry. Your livelihood is on the line every time you pick up the weapon.

Mike

 

[Eli]

The only reason this is 'newsworthy' is the fact a firearm was involved. If he'd accidentally backed into the woman, injuring her, we wouldn't have heard a word.

Eli

 

[SC-Texas]

How about someone sho has been to the restauarant stopping by.

 

[SC-Texas]

We should have a large gathering there and if they have 30.06 signs get up and walk out, tell the owner what we think of his 30.06 signs and his attitude toward concealed carry.

 

[Greg_TX]

We should have a large gathering there and if they have 30.06 signs get up and walk out, tell the owner what we think of his 30.06 signs and his attitude toward concealed carry.

Well, given that the owner has just had a customer shot in the ass by someone carrying a firearm, I don't think he or she would be very sympathetic and would say "good riddance". It's going to be hard to argue the case in favor of letting customers carry while the owner has this example of negligence to make their case against it.

 

[majormadmax]

Well, given that the owner has just had a customer shot in the ass by someone carrying a firearm, I don't think he or she would be very sympathetic and would say "good riddance". It's going to be hard to argue the case in favor of letting customers carry while the owner has this example of negligence to make their case against it.

Well put, and despite what some think, it's the property owners absolute right to prohibit firearms on the premises. I don't think some huge protest is going to change his mind; in fact, I think it would only been seen as negative towards the pro-gun community.

What right do we have to tell someone what they can do on their property? People on here scream about property owner rights, and then turn around and want to protest those who exercise those rights if they don't agree with them...

If you refuse to shop/eat at an establishment because of a 30.06 sign, that's your right; but wanting to conduct such a protest as described above won't accomplish anything...

 

[MR Redneck]

Well put, and despite what some think, it's the property owners absolute right to prohibit firearms on the premises. I don't think some huge protest is going to change his mind; in fact, I think it would only been seen as negative towards the pro-gun community.

What right do we have to tell someone what they can do on their property? People on here scream about property owner rights, and then turn around and want to protest those who exercise those rights if they don't agree with them...

If you refuse to shop/eat at an establishment because of a 30.06 sign, that's your right; but wanting to conduct such a protest as described above won't accomplish anything...

I agree. Same thing goes for throwing new's crews off your property.

 

[KAK]

I didnt know raffas was anti gun. Thats walking distance from my parents house. Never liked their food, thay take good things and dump fancy ass sauces all over them and screw them up. Ill never eat there again.

Also if you buy high quality firearms they dont fire when dropped. Why anyone would carry a POS derringer is beyond me.

 

[texas1willy2]

For what it's worth there is no sign in front of Raffa's, didn't go inside but I looked in the waiting area as well.

 

[2Shots1Wound]

Who actually carries around a Derringer? Old people have some funny ideas on self defense I guess.

 

[majormadmax]

For what it's worth there is no sign in front of Raffa's, didn't go inside but I looked in the waiting area as well.

Thanks, it sounded suspiciously that they didn't; despite what they claimed...

 

[KAK]

What is that all about. the articles I have read about this incident seem to pronounce this guy as breaking the 30.06 law.

EVERY firearm should have some form of drop safety.

Also I can not think of a gun that would be worse for defensive carry than a 2 shot 38 spl with no holster or drop safety.

 

[texas1willy2]

Thanks, it sounded suspiciously that they didn't; despite what they claimed...

I read in the paper a couple days ago where he claims they're posted?

I didn't see any?

 

[majormadmax]

I read in the paper a couple days ago where he claims they're posted?

I didn't see any?

I think he said it in the original report as well (I'm too lazy to go back and check). Unless they have proof that they did, that's one aspect of this incident that is negated.

However, the individual in question is still in trouble for the ND. I agree with those that question their choice of firearms, is certainly not one I would choose! I hope the victim makes a quick and thorough recovery!

Cheers! M2

 

[SC-Texas]

Well I disagree. 2011 is a no shrug year and letting the owner know that being anti firearm will cost him business is well worth the effort.

Sorry.