the guest aspect is interesting and I keep going back to no threats of violence were made by the guy who was shot
So going hands on with someone (assault) isn't violence?
the guest aspect is interesting and I keep going back to no threats of violence were made by the guy who was shot
What part of that is confusing?
You lose your right to claim self defense if you are the one escalating the incident unless you first attempt to disengage and the other guy presses an attack.So going hands on with someone (assault) isn't violence?
… the Elephant in the room. …
If Paxton had anything to do with the ex-wife’s appointment, there may also be a conflict of interest in the AG’s office. Not that ethics matters to Paxton.AG lawyers
Don’t believe I’ve ever had the pleasure of that condition.…Regardless, the whole thing was more pathetic than a penis with erectile disfunction, on a cold night, after a handful of benadryl...
It's what happens when you EDC a 1911.Don’t believe I’ve ever had the pleasure of that condition.
Otherwise, good catch on sequence of events.
It's what happens when you EDC a 1911.
yep...The oldest child has expressed to me that he blames his mother for the shooting, and that he will run away from home if he sees Kyle there again.
Damn - With the Dixie chicks and chickens in the background.Widow releases video of Chad Read's fatal shooting in South Lubbock
Jennifer Read, is also seeking custody of her husband's children.www.lubbockonline.com
yep...
agreed that when the guy walked out with the gun, a good thing for other guy to do would be to walk awaySo going hands on with someone (assault) isn't violence?
Don’t believe I’ve ever had the pleasure of that condition.
Otherwise, good catch on sequence of events.
also, from the article:Widow releases video of Chad Read's fatal shooting in South Lubbock
Jennifer Read, is also seeking custody of her husband's children.www.lubbockonline.com
yep...
Yeah... I had to go back a re-read the castle doctrine rule again. It pertains to anyone that has the right to be at the location. So the BF had the right to be there. I'll go and shut up now....Would it matter if he lived there?
Since they were engaged in a felony crime, wouldn't that negate any self-defense Carruth could possibly have? @Renegade - whats your take there?
Good take on events.Everyone here knows I have the intellect of a three year old, but I want to weigh in on something I haven’t seen brought up.
The shooter went into the house to get a gun, then came out and yelled, “get off mah proprity!”, right? I mean did I miss something?
Ok, so that indicates that if Chad did not get off his “proprity”, tiny Tim was prepared to shoot him, simply for that refusal. Otherwise one must conclude that tiny Tim new the future and could tell that he would need to “defend himself”.
On top of that, the warning shot during the gay chest sex, proves he wasn’t in fear for his life, but instead was in fear he wasn’t intimidating enough.
It is for these reasons that my inadequate mind has developed an opinion that this was not a good shoot.
Regardless, the whole thing was more pathetic than a penis with erectile disfunction, on a cold night, after a handful of benadryl.
On a serious note, if the facts are reflected through the face value of this video, I feel sorry for the dad. Yea, he was part of the circus, but when my wife and I had troubles some years ago, and she threatened to leave with the kids, I damn near turned into a person I never knew I could become. So if there is anyone who at least had a smidge of a reason to behave the way they were, it’s him.