So they removed the account provided by Police, and are now going with the account provided by the defendant.....
I didn't read it like that. I read it as: "We're seeing so many contradictory statements that we're removing stuff till we know better."That is journalism today. How about the next post, where the Journalist removed the Police account, and are running the defendant account? WTF is that.
The linked story doesn't present "the account provided by the defendant" in any more authoritative or detailed way than we've seen elsewhere.
Or am I missing something?