Theoretically One that could be disassembled might be best for this applicationAlthough, if ya kill the perp, then remove/hide the can, would anyone know?
Theoretically One that could be disassembled might be best for this applicationAlthough, if ya kill the perp, then remove/hide the can, would anyone know?
No good argument is ever really over...I thought this was all hashed out in MAY when I wrote about it in the NFA sectiuon and then it was combined into this thread.
HB 957 passed
Apologies if this is dupe, i couldn't find another thread about HB957 here or the NFA section. Please move or delete as appropriate. So HB 957 just passed per https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=87R&Bill=HB957 A few websites have described the bill as What this bill...www.texasguntalk.com
and now it is being /rethreaded??
Should this be combined as a similar discussion or should I start a new, new, new discussion?
I get a thread and you get a thread and you get a thread............................As Oprah would say, "Threads for everyone!"
Can you guarantee for a fact that the bullet will not make any contact with the suppressor?
Are you willing to gamble your freedom on your guarantee?
I'm not in the least concerned.
Just curious, are you a troll or do you have some actual information to share?
Seems you trolls are getting more and more active lately!
Oh I see, not only like to go trolling the forum, but you must also have a side job as comedian too!
When a some "know-it-all" comes here, making trollish remarks, I have little use for learning jack-squat from them. You might work on your online behavior and attitude a bit before posting again. Just some free advice.
So you own a suppressor. So do millions of other people.
Just curious, do you hold a degree of any sort in ballistics, or forensics, or engineering. or maybe perhaps in designing and building suppressors?
Your first reply on this thread quoting one of my posts, was trollish remark, which you made to instigate an argument.
So yes, you were trolling the forum. The rest of us were having a discussion. I also asserted my thoughts and opinions might, or might not be valid. But you seem to like to cherry-pick a couple of posts I made without reading all the posts I made on this thread. So yes again, you were trolling.
Would you like some salve for that butthurt you seem to have?
View attachment 262643
Show us then.
Send me a jar, please; I really need it, cause you are a royal pain in the ass...Your first reply on this thread quoting one of my posts, was trollish remark, which you made to instigate an argument.
So yes, you were trolling the forum. The rest of us were having a discussion. I also asserted my thoughts and opinions might, or might not be valid. But you seem to like to cherry-pick a couple of posts I made without reading all the posts I made on this thread. So yes again, you were trolling.
Would you like some salve for that butthurt you seem to have?
View attachment 262643
Holy cow... Lots of bad information in this thread...
Gave me an idea though, someone should make a non baffled, rifled suppressor .
You probably already know this, so not pointed to you. But yes, they do make baffle-less suppressors, AKA fake cans or blast cans.
I read somewhere that this law might be used as a basis for testing intrastate commerce laws and possibly taking to SCOTUS as a states right issue. Just like auto knives can be shipped intrastate, long guns can be shipped intrastate. Don't ask me for my source, I believe it was one of the gun organizations.
All the debate about bullet markings are not pertinent.
Texas won't prosecute you for having an unregistered silencer, and won't help the feds prosecute you.
I agree that Fed Law trumps, however there is a real and tangible result from every state passing these laws. Politicians are all self serving individuals, they and their staffs take notice when voters support an issue and will also support that issue IF they think it might enhance their status and/or re-election.Soo, the law that was signed, has no real legal protection on a federal level? From the little I've read from other states that have similar laws, the person selling and buying can and have been prosecuted and convicted by ATF. (Please correct me if wrong).