It truly is amusing how bloodthirsty Democrats get with each other.
Amusing, and down right fun to watch.
It truly is amusing how bloodthirsty Democrats get with each other.
It truly is amusing how bloodthirsty Democrats get with each other.
Is anyone really surprised by what a sleazebag (in this case dorky too - rarely found in the make up of a woman) politician does?
Hell, she got away with her pretense for an overly long time, but couldn't leave it alone and now gets to reap the whirlwind of derision and shouts of laughter.
The lenient tribes require that, to be considered Native American, one must be 1/16th Native.
She seems to not make the cut, being 1/32nd. She had a parent that might have rightfully claimed to be native at 1/16th.
Heck, I'm maybe 1/128th or 1/512th of some minority.
Have I been filling out my ATF 4473 wrong???
I don’t know where you got “1/32nd” but it’s completely false. She released her DNA test and admitted to being at most 1/64th. But as little as 1/1024th. You need to stick with facts.
Also worth noting, the DNA test didn’t specifically test for “Native American” ancestry so the number could be far lower.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It truly is amusing how bloodthirstyDemocratspoliticians get with each other.
The lenient tribes require that, to be considered Native American, one must be 1/16th Native.
She seems to not make the cut, being 1/32nd. She had a parent that might have rightfully claimed to be native at 1/16th.
Heck, I'm maybe 1/128th or 1/512th of some minority.
Have I been filling out my ATF 4473 wrong???
Dude, I sincerely hope you're playing the biggest, longest troll game in history.
If you can choose your sex, why can't you choose your race?
Your 'stance' on climate change, for starters. There's been other things that, honestly, are inconsistent. You parrot talking points that are scientifically unprovable, but throw a few bones here and there that may hint you can see how the bulk of the science is in many instances profit-driven self promotion. I'm not saying you need to take a hard firm stance, because I sometimes don't when there's opinion involved (I only truly believe verifiable, provable science but I'm open for speculation) but quoting media outlets as truths doesn't help to firm up ones position. Especially earlier today with using HuffPo as a source? That raised more eyebrows than just mine.Me?
Is there any one part of what I've said that you disagree with?
Please elaborate.