Trumpf can go F himself.

[wiredgeorge]

Interesting side note... Supreme Court is hearing arguments about Trump being held off the Colorado ballot. Maine is waiting to hear how this shakes out and a bunch of other blue states are in the process of deciding Trump should not be on their ballots. I use duckduckgo as a search engine and I think they rely on Google (not sure) but in any case, I went through FOUR pages of search results on what is going on and all the sources were the NYT, CNN, MSN, NPR (ad nauseum) and not one conservative news source (not even Fox). Went to Newsmax and they have live coverage... go figure. Sounds like SCOTUS may not be happy with the Dem's attempts to rig the election by deciding Trump is an insurrectionist (without a trial).

 

[toddnjoyce]

..I went through FOUR pages of search results on what is going on and all the sources were the NYT, CNN, MSN, NPR (ad nauseum) and not one conservative news source (not even Fox)...

You can hear the arguments live (or archived)at supremecourt.gov, also entry/exit to the courtroom is strictly controlled during oral arguments, so most SCOTUS hearing coverage doesn’t start until after the end of the afternoon session.

Opinion releases are different though.

 

[oldag]

Interesting side note... Supreme Court is hearing arguments about Trump being held off the Colorado ballot. Maine is waiting to hear how this shakes out and a bunch of other blue states are in the process of deciding Trump should not be on their ballots. I use duckduckgo as a search engine and I think they rely on Google (not sure) but in any case, I went through FOUR pages of search results on what is going on and all the sources were the NYT, CNN, MSN, NPR (ad nauseum) and not one conservative news source (not even Fox). Went to Newsmax and they have live coverage... go figure. Sounds like SCOTUS may not be happy with the Dem's attempts to rig the election by deciding Trump is an insurrectionist (without a trial).

WSJ covering and adding updates.

 

[General Zod]

WSJ covering and adding updates.

WSJ hasn't been conservative since the Reagan administration.

 

[oldag]

WSJ hasn't been conservative since the Reagan administration.

Editorial section still fairly conservative. News desk, not so much.

 

[General Zod]

Editorial section still fairly conservative. News desk, not so much.

WSJ editorial board is about as conservative as Mitt Romney.

 

[Axxe55]

Just maybe do a little less of it before you post........

YOU TALK PRETTY BADASS FROM BEHIND YOUR KEYBOARD!LOL!

 

[DoubleDuty]

Interesting side note... Supreme Court is hearing arguments about Trump being held off the Colorado ballot. Maine is waiting to hear how this shakes out and a bunch of other blue states are in the process of deciding Trump should not be on their ballots. I use duckduckgo as a search engine and I think they rely on Google (not sure) but in any case, I went through FOUR pages of search results on what is going on and all the sources were the NYT, CNN, MSN, NPR (ad nauseum) and not one conservative news source (not even Fox). Went to Newsmax and they have live coverage... go figure. Sounds like SCOTUS may not be happy with the Dem's attempts to rig the election by deciding Trump is an insurrectionist (without a trial).

They shouldn't be happy. It's election interference on a bogus interpretation of the 14th Amendment. Not only that there was no insurrection on January 6th. Democrats are evil scum that want absolute power. The citizens had better wake up.

 

[Cool 'Horn Luke]

Democrats are evil scum that want absolute power.

 

[oldag]

WSJ editorial board is about as conservative as Mitt Romney.

Calling BS on that.

 

[Dawico]

YOU TALK PRETTY BADASS FROM BEHIND YOUR KEYBOARD!LOL!

I talk pretty bad ass in person, too.

When I'm behind the keyboard, I can use punctuation and control my caps lock key.

When you have good information to share, it's worth making legible. That's not a problem for you, I see.

 

[TheDan]

 

[General Zod]

Calling BS on that.

Not the first thing we've disagreed on.

 

[craigntx]

Look ar the end game: Hes tryna get the drunk sissy vote

 

[oldag]

Not the first thing we've disagreed on.

And won't be the last, I am sure.

If I wanted to spend the time, I could go back and pick editorials that reference their staunch defense of the 1A, 2A. Their stern criticism of woke, DEI, ESG, anti-semitism, etc. Hardly liberal positions.

But as is typical, if someone doesn't like every single thing another says - well then the other person is labeled liberal, Democrat, RINO, etc.

 

[Sasquatch]

Maybe Trump's campaign team hired some of McCain & DeSantis' campaign team members, hence this nonsense.

While I think second chances are reasonable, they need to be precipitated by legit actions taken by the group / person wanting a second chance to correct whatever bullshit that got them in hot water first. Not wait until AFTER people decide to give a 2nd chance, but take proactive steps to make amends first then ask for foregiveness after demonstrating a desire to change their ways. For AB it should've started with firing everyone who had a hand in that rediculous campaign, sending an apology letter to every investor, and pledging to remove any DEI nonsense, and all the other woke garbage policies from its companies across the board and stick to what they'd done for the last few decades.

Then again, didn't AB say that Bud Light was going away in favor of Bud Light Seltzer a few years back? I thought they were going all in on targetting the White Claw crowd and letting go of boomers and gen X'ers? That didn't work out either, I guess.

 

[kbaxter60]

But as is typical, if someone doesn't like every single thing another says - well then the other person is labeled liberal, Democrat, RINO, etc.

...or even (gasp) Trump Worshipper!

 

[General Zod]

If I wanted to spend the time, I could go back and pick editorials...

But I didn't spend time. Ten second Google search and there was a prime example. If you've gotta search and pick to prove your point, then your point isn't very strong.

 

[oldag]

But I didn't spend time. Ten second Google search and there was a prime example. If you've gotta search and pick to prove your point, then your point isn't very strong.

If you read the WSJ on a daily basis, you would find plenty of examples in the categories I mentioned. Just because they may not be in today's edition does not mean they do not exist. They do. Go look if you want to be more educated. I don't have time right now to do that for you.

Sheesshhhh.

 

[General Zod]

Sheesshhhh.

Grow up, man. You're acting like a Democrat.