Ukrainian air defense forces said Tuesday in a statement: “This night Russia attacked Ukraine from south, north, and east. From six aircraft MiG-31K, six hypersonic missiles X-47M2 ‘Kinzhal’ were launched, 9 cruise missiles ‘Kalіbr’ — from ships off the Black Sea and three ground-based missiles (S-400, ‘Iskander-M’). All of them were shot down.”
Ben,
Thank you!
It looks like he's decided to extend his three-part series with an open-ended Q&A series based on the feedback from the original three.Thanks been great video
So much fail for ruzzia.I guess this was Russian attempts to overwhelm the new Patriot system and take out is radar and launcher deployment.
Happy to do it.Thank you again Ben for these very informative videos.
Please, keep em coming!
Ukraine is not a nato country so it is not a nato problem. Seriously though, are you an American or are you sitting in a room in Ukraine promoting their BS?It is Europe's problem but we are part of NATO so our people by treaty will be in the fight. Seriously though, are you an American or are you sitting in a room in Russia promoting their BS?
Doesn’t take much of a VPN to make a Russian propagandist look like he is sitting in Dallas while drinking vodka in Moscow.Ukraine is not a nato country so it is not a nato problem. Seriously though, are you an American or are you sitting in a room in Ukraine promoting their BS?
How many videos and quotes do we have to post of russian officials and spokesman saying they want to retake Europe and once Ukriane is denazified, then come Poland and Lithuania and Estonia and Latvia and Finland and Germany...Ukraine is not a nato country so it is not a nato problem. Seriously though, are you an American or are you sitting in a room in Ukraine promoting their BS?
Doesn’t take much of a VPN to make a Russian propagandist look like he is sitting in Dallas while drinking vodka in Moscow.
I don't disagree but why hasn't this cost offset been presented to us like you have but with concrete numbers attached. I find your answer more tolerable than hearing we just threw away billions on a stupid war.How many videos and quotes do we have to post of russian officials and spokesman saying they want to retake Europe and once Ukriane is denazified, then come Poland and Lithuania and Estonia and Latvia and Finland and Germany...
I don't want Ukrianians to die, but why not supply them and let them keep doing a good job kicking russian ass so we don't have to send our troops to get killed?
Accepting a negotiator's word sidestepping responsibility for hosting failed talks = swallowed hook, line and sinker
Accepting a parties self-admission on further attacking Europe after they just made good on one threat = dismissed as codswallop
Let's continue to send equipment that we don't use and that costs us money to upkeep so it can be used to slay some rashists.
Its like having an old functional car you don't drive. You have to maintain it, wash it, pay for insurance... but when you donate it you get to "claim" the value as the original MSRP. We are giving a lot, but its not as much as it sounds like. The equipment has been bought and paid for, the value to out government was recovered through use, now someone else can use it. There is no downside
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
clearly you put more faith in those statements than most of the European countries that they supposedly plan to take over. Maybe there is a reason for that…How many videos and quotes do we have to post of russian officials and spokesman saying they want to retake Europe and once Ukriane is denazified, then come Poland and Lithuania and Estonia and Latvia and Finland and Germany...
I don't want Ukrianians to die, but why not supply them and let them keep doing a good job kicking russian ass so we don't have to send our troops to get killed?
Accepting a negotiator's word sidestepping responsibility for hosting failed talks = swallowed hook, line and sinker
Accepting a parties self-admission on further attacking Europe after they just made good on one threat = dismissed as codswallop
Let's continue to send equipment that we don't use and that costs us money to upkeep so it can be used to slay some rashists.
Its like having an old functional car you don't drive. You have to maintain it, wash it, pay for insurance... but when you donate it you get to "claim" the value as the original MSRP. We are giving a lot, but its not as much as it sounds like. The equipment has been bought and paid for, the value to out government was recovered through use, now someone else can use it. There is no downside
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
Looked for a moment and couldn't find a current value of the supplied equipment, but did find this:I don't disagree but why hasn't this cost offset been presented to us like you have but with concrete numbers attached. I find your answer more tolerable than hearing we just threw away billions on a stupid war.
Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk
clearly you put more faith in those statements than most of the European countries that they supposedly plan to take over. Maybe there is a reason for that…
For your comments about the negotiations, youre just making things up as you go because you know nothing about the negotiations other than what I’ve posted here. Had I not mentioned the interview you would have never even known it happened.
What you say about the aid we provide is also an oversimplification.