...can law enforcement take a person's legally carried firearm without any probable cause that a crime is being committed? Must a hunter in the field surrender his firearm just because a conservation warden tells him to?
http://www.lakelandtimes.com/main.asp?
constituion prohibits military operating in country without legislative approval. posse commatatus. schools no longr teach the constituion as it was written . joe mccarthy was rigth,but was to late.we now wave communist elected to house and senate of u.s.
I see they're passing around the the crack pipe as you walk in the door today.
McCarthy... yup, everyone knows black listing, tribunals, curtailing of rights like freedom of speech, freedom to congregate, etc... that's VERY American.
JKTex….
Let’s not get personal. That does not help the cause. The posting by m squared shows that he has the right ideas, but may have difficulty putting them into words. The term, “posse commatatusis” is an important issue with the military and one of the biggest violations of the Constitution that occurred during Hurricane Katrina/Rita.
The problem was that the Military was sent in for “Humanitarian” reasons and got caught up in posse commatatus actions. The soldiers lost sight of their “true mission”. This was not an intentional act by the Military but a failure of training. They lost sight of what the true mission of the American Soldier is all about: Defending the “We the People” of this great nation.
A lot of the responsibility for that failure falls squarely on the shoulders of the Law Enforcement community in New Orleans. Notice that the New Orleans Police used more support officers from the Northeast U.S. than they did from adjoining States? States like New Jersey! Ever stop to wonder why?
The Constitution clearly states that the military will be “Subordinate” to the local authorities. However, that does not mean that soldiers can be used by the police for posse commatatus activities… as they were in New Orleans. The military was “Just following orders” from some ignorant “Civil Authorities”. That was quickly remedied as soon as the Generals arrived on scene.
To further the problem: the “Civil Authorities” in New Orleans were able to effectively use the media to let the military (and FEMA) take the blame for the entire failure; while New Orleans officials (to this date) profit from the theft of thousands of personal firearms.
That is why I personally boycott any activity that happens in New Orleans.
I'm still kinda new around here, but you seem to be some sort of an expert on Communism, you might have a real interest in what a KGB defector, Yuri Bezmenov, had to say on that very issue.
His little talk used to be neatly available in 9 segments but now is just chopped up in a lot of video segments.
If you take the time to watch them all you might find them very interesting.
YouTube - Bezmenov on demoralization in America
Hmmm.... not an expert on Communism and the KGB, Just you're average intelligence analyst in the US Army.
BTW, watched the video clips, very interesting. Not a new concept to me though, I happen to work in a PsyOp Unit.
If I am following you correctly, you are thinking like I am, that a lot of people did wrong and were to blame for what is an obvious and serious violation of American Law.
From what I can tell, all levels of government involved feel that no one is to blame.