That's what I was wondering, how many of those now wondering how this happened took the time to cast a ballot. I'm a simple thinker, but it seems to me to be easier to take time to vote and ask everyone like-minded to vote, than to rescind bad laws after they're passed because there was low voter turnout.More accurately, slightly more than 53% of those who voted got what they voted for.
Over 59% of Virginia’s registered voters actually voted. It’s be interesting to see how things turned out if all 5+ million voters actually voted.
Instead, about 1.75m voters, or 21% of the total population got what they wanted.
Historically, in national election years, About 59% of Texas’ registered voters actually go to the polls; that’s about 9m total, with around 4-5m voters determining the political results for 28m Texans.
When you swing hard with only 1/4 (or less) of the population’s support, you better be ready for the backlash. And that’s where Ds make their mistake. They look at polls based on biased questions and biased respondent selection and take it as a mandate to deliver the policy equivalent of football bats and expect everyone to be grateful for those football bats.
Doesn't the Constitution allow militia to stop some one knowingly committing 18 CFR CR 115Never knew Virginia Joined the UK????.......Time to Vote that COMMUNIST OUT!!!
Will you call yourself stupid, if / when Texas turns blue? I believe most native Virginians are conservative, they just have a couple things going against them. East coast, big cities and close proximity to D.C. Urbanites are mainly progressives, they love living near the coast and congregate in big cities. Texas is seeing the influx itself, just not as fast as Virginia has.
I believe all Constitutional loving free people should stick together in this fight, and not turn our backs on them and just say "you got your just desserts", otherwise, there'll be few left to fight.
Consider how many Bloomberg commercials you see on the television on all channels including cable channels. Bloomberg is dumping at least 100 million to word a version of subliminal mind control on the population. His adds seem to start out with beating the NRA and pushing gun control, then moves to other topics.
It would not surprise me that his spending is aimed at furthering the Democrat agenda as well as his hope to become the Democrat nominee.
I suppose I did not word that well. My point was no matter if Bloomberg gets the nomination, the message of his adds is brainwashing to any and all who might be swayed to the agenda of the socialist left.You Think.
Although it won't go into effect until the 2024 presidential election, it will also change the amount of Reps. in the house.If we don't allow the President to put the citizenship question on the census for 2020, and not count the illegals and use a drivers license test for voting, don't we face the possibility of losing control of the electoral college vote to the coasts?
If the reapportionment wont take affect until 2024 wont the states giving drivers licenses and then using that for voter ID affect the election? They are also working hard to increase immigration legal/illegal now.Although it won't go into effect until the 2024 presidential election, it will also change the amount of Reps. in the house.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/b...hift-electoral-college-favor-democrats-108131
I'm not really sure how many voter fraud cases there really are, it's pretty hard to define. Immigration, both legal and illegal spiked during the latter Obama years and only slowed down recently. The majority of those legal in that time are voting democrat, but even illegals, whether they vote or not can effect the census, and that in turn can change the number in the house of representatives.If the reapportionment wont take affect until 2024 wont the states giving drivers licenses and then using that for voter ID affect the election? They are also working hard to increase immigration legal/illegal now.
This isn't going to help matters in Virginia:
https://dailycaller.com/2019/12/24/...budget-in-anticipation-of-jailing-gun-owners/
I believe the sedition is against him, but the founding fathers did leave instructions to the affect what should be done in the event of a tyrannical government.If the governor is knowingly going against the 2nd amendment of the constitution is he not committing sedition and therefore the militia can stand against his action?
If they are not using IDs that show US citizenship, then they are worthless to keep illegals from voting.If the reapportionment wont take affect until 2024 wont the states giving drivers licenses and then using that for voter ID affect the election? They are also working hard to increase immigration legal/illegal now.
Much like a lot of other states that are run by the left, a geographically tiny portion of Virginia that is densely populated with Free Shit Army decided for the rest of the state.They didn't get just desserts, they got what they voted for
Interesting thought. Perhaps so. Else, you are likely to see a lot of states continuing down the "split" road. We were in WA and they talked for years about splitting the West side off to give the moonbats their own state and to have a thinking, reasonable state from the rest. CA was going to split, what?, five ways?Shit like this makes me wonder if the states need an electoral college system( at least for Governor’s races)
Absolutely.......so sick of Governors ignoring The Constitution of the UNITED STATES!!!They just voted the communists into control.
They are stupid and deserve some "elections have consequences" experience.
Doesn't the Constitution allow militia to stop some one knowingly committing 18 CFR CR 115
CHAPTER 115—TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES...2384.Seditious conspiracy? If it doesn't how do we prevent it?
Bloomberg dumped a ton of cash to swing VA from red to blue. That jackwagon didn't stop at NY.
The rank and file Mil and LE are by and large pro 2A. It's the politicians and chiefs who push the progressive agenda. Good article.