That said, now that I know what I know what I know, I still wonder how that sign differs from a "gun buster" sign.
I know I can ignore a "gun buster" sign and, if detected and asked to leave, simply leave and have committed no crime.
I'm 50-50 whether the invalid 30.06 fits the above.
Rest assured that a statutorily invalid sign is indeed an invalid sign, period.
But, since lack of proper signage is not necessarily a guarantee against prosecution, you could well be forced to prove that it is indeed invalid on it's technical aspects, regardless of intent. The point is, why go through that expense, regardless whether the risk is low that you won't prevail?
Unfortunately, over zealous prosecutors who are willing to push the limits of the envelope, and LEO's who aren't necessarily well informed, are a dime a dozen in today's justice system.
Last edited: