Zimmerman Trial: Tired of media bias? See gun-friendly legal coverage

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 16, 2010
    88
    1
    Boston, MA
    1st Written Statement of Zimmerman to Police, Night of Shooting

    George Zimmerman fired the shot that killed Trayvon Martin at 7:17PM, Sunday, February 26, 2012.


    Just over four hours later, at 11:36PM, Zimmerman signed his first written statement recounting the events of the shooting to Investigator Singleton of the Sanford Police Department.


    If you've ever been interested in seeing that written statement first-hand, instead of just hearing the evidence misinterpreted through a disinformation campaign fully supported by the mainstream media, now's your chance. Ever wonder how much, if at all, Zimmerman's later recounting of events might have changed from his original statement to police? Don't rely on any one else's opinion (not even mine)--come take a look at the evidence yourself.


    I've obtained a copy of Zimmerman's original 4-page hand-written statement to the police, and uploaded both a typed transcript (a bit easier to read) and a PDF scan of the original documents to the Law of Self Defense blog.


    You can access that blog post directly here: Zimmerman's 1st Written Statement to Police the Night of the Shooting.


    Once at the blog you can also, of course, access the many other blog postings on both the Zimmerman case and other self-defense issues from around the country--it's all totally free, of course.


    Be sure to register if you'd like to be alerted directly whenever we post up a new self-defense related blog, which usually happens two or three times a week. Although I post here in this forum as much as I can, a lot of longer pieces of legal analysis just isn't well suited to a forum post.


    Enjoy.


    Andrew
    @LawSelfDefense
    Facebook: Law of Self Defense
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 16, 2010
    88
    1
    Boston, MA
    Myth Busters: Did Zimmerman "chase" Martin against police orders?

    Hey folks,


    One of the many untruths in the Zimmerman case that has been vigorously disseminated and ingrained into the public consciousness is that Zimmerman "chased/followed" Martin against police orders, or that he exited his vehicle after being told to stay inside the vehicle, or other variations of this theme.


    This narrative has continued, with the full-hearted support of the mainstream media and its hundreds of "investigative reporters" despite the fact that even a cursory review of the evidence clearly shows this narrative to be patently false.


    We know this because we have a real-time audio recording of the events in the form of Zimmerman's non-emergency phone call to the Sanford Police Department to report a suspicious person in his neighborhood.


    I've prepared an audio clip of the relevant part of that non-emergency call, as well as an annotated transcript of what I hear in that audio clip, and posted them to my Law of Self Defense blog here.


    When I listen to that audio not only do I NOT hear Zimmerman disobeying the dispatcher's instructions, I hear him exiting the vehicle specifically to answer the dispatcher's explicit question.


    Take a listen/look and let me know what YOU think. Personally, I think this myth is . . . BUSTED.


    Andrew
    @LawSelfDefense
    Facebook: Law of Self Defense
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 16, 2010
    88
    1
    Boston, MA
    New Game: Count the untruths in the affidavit for probable cause (see actual copy)

    Hey folks,


    George Zimmerman was arrested, charged, and soon will be tried for murder in the second degree based upon the affidavit for probable cause submitted by investigators from Angela Corey's office. *These two investigators, T.C. O'Steen and K.D. "Dale" Gilbreath, at the time collectively possessing 44 years of law enforcement including decades in homicides, put down on paper and under oath the words contained in this affidavit.


    I've obtained an copy of the original affidavit of probable cause (created a transcript for easier reading) and placed them at my blog for public access here: Zimmerman Trial: Evidentiary Flashback: Affidavit for Probable Cause–Count the untruths.


    Reading it now, with so much evidence finally revealed through discovery, and so much disinformation and propaganda now having been de-bunked, it is amazing that anyone could have believed the deceptions and untruths contained in this document.


    I have my own count, but I'm sure I must have missed some. *How about we play a count the "half-truths/un-truths" game and see how many you folks can identify and list.


    Bonus points for whoever can find in this affidavit, even assuming every word in it is true, the elements of murder in the second degree--782.04(2). Murder--gets bonus points, because I sure can't find them.


    Not even if the affidavit is true. *(Which it's not.)


    (For a discussion of what Florida law means when it requires that a person have acted with a "depraved mind" to be guilty of murder 2, see: Getting to Murder 2: Finding George Zimmerman’s “Depraved Mind”, over at Legal Insurrection.)


    Anyway, take a look for yourselves and see what you think.


    Good hunting.


    Andrew
    @LawSelfDefense
    Facebook: Law of Self Defense
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 16, 2010
    88
    1
    Boston, MA
    Myth Busters: Did Zimmerman "racially profile" Martin?

    Hey folks,


    First a quick reminder that I'll be providing live, all-day coverage of Day 6 of jury selection for the Zimmerman trial over at Legal Insurrection. We'll provide live video streaming, a rolling Twitter feed of selected contributors, real-time posts of breaking events, and of course our wildly popular end-of-day wrap up. *I don't have a link for you until we go live, but we'll start coverage as soon as the Court goes into session, usually right at 9AM.


    Now, to the meat of this post: Myth Busters: Did Zimmerman really "racially profile" Trayvon Martin, and was that alleged racial motivation the "depraved mind" element that makes this killing qualify as murder in the second degree?


    NBC News produced a version of the recording of Zimmerman's non-emergency call to the police in which he appeared to volunteer, unsolicited, the fact that Martin was black. (NBC is currently being sued by Zimmerman for this act of malice.)


    Fortunately, you don't have to rely on anyone else's "opinion" on the matter. In my newest blog post I have placed a copy of both the relevant snippet of that call and a transcript of what was said (for convenience):


    Myth Busters: Did Zimmerman really “racially profile” Martin?


    Take a listen/look and see what you think. Did Zimmerman racially profile Martin? *Based on the facts in evidence, I'd have to say that myth is . . . BUSTED!


    Andrew


    @LawSelfDefense
    Facebook: Law of Self Defense
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 16, 2010
    88
    1
    Boston, MA

    FlashBang

    Active Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 7, 2012
    584
    1
    Bastrop TX
    Didn't the Feds investigate as to whether or not this could be charged as a 'hate crime' and their findings come back that there was no 'hate crime' due to no racial element? Seems to me that if the FBI found there was no racist element, how is the State going to argue racial profiling?
     
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 16, 2010
    88
    1
    Boston, MA
    Didn't the Feds investigate as to whether or not this could be charged as a 'hate crime' and their findings come back that there was no 'hate crime' due to no racial element? Seems to me that if the FBI found there was no racist element, how is the State going to argue racial profiling?

    Yes, and yes. And having had personal experience working with Special Agents of the Bureau (one of whom was the best man at my wedding a few years back), I can assure you that neither they nor their reports miss much. I have copies of at least some of their witness reports around here somewhere, if I can find the time I'll do a blog post about their (lack of) findings on the issue of any racial motivation on Zimmerman's part.

    Andrew
    @LawSelfDefense
    Facebook: Law of Self Defense
     
    Top Bottom