txinvestigator, I dont remember George Bush as being dangerous to gun owners, unlike
the guys before and AFTER him. I think your bias as a liberal is showing, sir!
It is the nature of carrying a gun that is dangerous. Dangerous to [George Bush] evil doers [/George Bush]
That's an old man way to say LOL.
So inefficient.
If carrying with one in the chamber is good, shouldn't we carry with 2 in the chamber?
I dont have any ARs so it doesn't happen to me.You let us know how that works out for ya.
To ALL,
Concerning the so-called "Israeli Carry" (Loaded magazine/Empty chamber), I recently had "a long lunch" with an IDF physician (He's here receiving advanced oncology training at Ft Sam Houston Joint medical Center.) & LTC.
During lunch, that "carry method" came up in conversation & the LTC's comment was, "We used to train that method about 25 or more years ago & found that it didn't work well. Since my entry into the IDF in 1984, no such 'empty chamber training' has been done by our police or military forces."
He then said, "In 2014, all of our armed personnel carry single-action semi-automatics 'cocked & locked' and double-action pistols are carried with loaded chamber."
yours, satx
You get the myth buster award fo da daybreaking contact,
YEP. It does.
yours, satx
Takes things awhile to die in the gun community as there is much repetitious talk but little research and investigation.
Anyone who thinks they'll be able to rack the slide on their gun when the time comes has no idea how fast and violent an attack can be. Look how hard it is just to pull a holstered gun out and get off a shot:
And that is from open carry, not having to dig into or under clothing.....