Daenerys is hot.
The nipple time was worth it. The character is hard core. Cinematography, showing the violence and prowess of who she is going up against.
She burns them alive and walks out, King Bit#h. Unstoppable Hotness.
Daenerys is hot.
The nipple time was worth it. The character is hard core. Cinematography, showing the violence and prowess of who she is going up against.
She burns them alive and walks out, King Bit#h. Unstoppable Hotness.
Yep. I wasn't referring to her looks (which are not bad).
The actress who plays her has insisted for some time that she will no longer do nudity for the show. I assume it was done via some sort of special effect, similar to the way the Queen Mother's walk of shame was accomplished.The nipple time was worth it.
Now Emilia Clarke, who plays the flame-proof Daenerys Targaryen, Mother Of Dragons, has spoken about her spectacular nude scene that wrapped the latest episode of the HBO medieval drama.
She told Entertainment Weekly: 'This is all me, all proud, all strong. That ain’t no body double!'
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...Game-Thrones-saying-ain-t-no-body-double.html
And the way that Tormund kept eyeing Brienne of Tarth was super cool. Brienne may wind up getting some action other than battle. I hope she does; if any character has earned a little recreation time, it's her.
I wish they hadn't killed off Osha as if she never really mattered as a character.
They should have gave her character more screen time before they did what they did.
We already knew Ramsay was evil. Re-emphasizing that fact in that way was, pardon the pun, overkill.I was sorry to see her go.
She claims it was all real.
The entertainment industry certainly knows how to manipulate their message, don't they?
... I loved this episode. It had several characters actually doing something to move the story along. After the first three episodes, with their plodding pace, it was a real bright spot....
If I was still in Jr. High, I'd really like it I'm sure.
As it is, it's not watchable.
Any specific objections? I think it's a pretty good telling of a huge story. The worst part of it is that we only get 10 hours per year.If I was still in Jr. High, I'd really like it I'm sure.
As it is, it's not watchable.
Fair point. Scenery is, indeed, chewed. I think there are enough quiet moments to compensate, especially some of Peter Dinklage's best scenes, but to each his own.The script and acting is so hyperbolic, ...
Fair point. Scenery is, indeed, chewed. I think there are enough quiet moments to compensate, especially some of Peter Dinklage's best scenes, but to each his own.
Of course, it doesn't hurt that I'm about as mature as the average 15-year-old, either.
Fair point. Scenery is, indeed, chewed. I think there are enough quiet moments to compensate, especially some of Peter Dinklage's best scenes, but to each his own.
Of course, it doesn't hurt that I'm about as mature as the average 15-year-old, either.