Axxe55
Retiretgtshit stirrer
Well said @candcallen .
The Idaho stop is a good or bad thing. Discuss.
I mean, as long as y'all want to go back and forth forever about something no one's gonna change their mind on...
I said he argued like a liberal because olhag had clearly stated his side, but cycleguy can't read or won't acknowledge his answer and instead uses the same lame talking points over and over. He doesn't listen, he only spews. Just like a liberal. I'll stand by it. phucktard or notJust an observation....
When someone, not point to anyone in particular cause I dont usually look at who made the post unless I'm quoting it but I think I read this 3 or 4 times here, calls another a liberal or Democrat cause they disagree with them they come across as a childish phuktard.
Unless said person is a self proclaimed liberal Democrat. God knows we got a few of those wondering from time to time.
You can disagree about a law or practice and politics have nothing to do with it.
Lane splitting seem oddly apolitical to me.
So does blocking a vehicle and pulling your gun on the driver. Now I would say dead men have no political affiliation or tell no tales but we all know that's not always true.
Like lane splitting it seems like it, the Idaho stop, is a self correcting kinda thing. Those who do it wrong are eventually removed from the equation.View attachment 264587
I'm for it!
The Idaho stop only applies to bicyclists.Curious. What is their definition of a "cyclist" ? Is this law applying to people riding bicycles, or motorcycles?
It's not for you or me to interpret the law. That's the job of lawyers and judges...like I've already quoted two of in my earlier post. You can read those, if you like...both list the specific law word for word in their source link...Traffic Code 545.060. That doesn't give MC any special priviliges...it addresses operators...and a MC driver is included. All this opinion stuff is misdirected. Whether we all disagree or agree doesn't matter. The law is the law. (it can be changed, but not by rantin' and ravin'on a talk forum.)Where is it clearly illegal?
There is not a single law which explicitly states a moto cannot. It is the combined interpretation of 545.060 and some of the other passing laws that make it "illegal", but challenge you to cite where it is "CLEARLY ILLEGAL"
Sent from your mom's house using Tapatalk
It's not for you or me to interpret the law. That's the job of lawyers and judges...like I've already quoted two of in my earlier post. You can read those, if you like...both list the specific law word for word in their source link...Traffic Code 545.060. That doesn't give MC any special priviliges...it addresses operators...and a MC driver is included. All this opinion stuff is misdirected. Whether we all disagree or agree doesn't matter. The law is the law. (it can be changed, but not by rantin' and ravin'on a talk forum.)
I WIN!I think you just knocked me out cold with your mantra from a fictional movie character. I am done here.
I WIN!
Sent from your mom's house using Tapatalk
It seems we both enjoy the show from our side...