Serious question - Why would you prefer this to a Model 27?I'd like a Smith & Wesson N-Frame, a model 29, rechambered and re-cylindered for .357 Magnum.
Serious question - Why would you prefer this to a Model 27?
Both are N-frames. I have known a few that rechambered and rebarreled a 27 to 44 mag. Only the Lord knows why due to the existence of the 29 but it's been done. My 520 that is also a N-Frame , when I sent it up to my buddy to work on before he passed, he had converted a number of 520's to 44mag, 45 colt etc. To add to that they fit the same holsters, the grips are the same . Just got rid of a model 27 , in the safe resides a 629 power port, and a 625 mountain gun. No Smith can take the abuse that a Ruger can take but I have a good friend that has a 28 he carried on duty for years that has been rebuilt 2 times and has well over 100,000 rounds down range. Still in great shape. If you want as close to indestructible, Redhawk in .357.The 27 is a sleeker, lighter frame since it was designed for the .357 Magnum. Its still a gorgeous gun, but since I'm thinking range toy, the over built heavier model 29 would be softer shooting and thus more pleasurable, I think for an extended range session. You could probably accomplisht he same thing by shooting bunny fart .44 specials from it - but since this thread is specific to a .357 / .38 spl - I'm thinking a heavy framed over built gun to tame the recoil.
Were I having to carry the thing for extended time - I may actually prefer the model 27, or to have the 29 chambered in .44 - only time I could fancy myself toting around a revolver would be hiking in the back country where bear, cougar, moose, or methbilly encounters are most likely, or to serve as a back up while hunting - where a magnum loading would be preferable to a typical semi-auto round like the 9x19 or .45 ACP. A Glock 20SF with hot 10mm loads comes close to .357 ballistics so I'd probably honestly prefer that for back country carry.
Both are N-frames. I have known a few that rechambered and rebarreled a 27 to 44 mag. Only the Lord knows why due to the existence of the 29 but it's been done. My 520 that is also a N-Frame , when I sent it up to my buddy to work on before he passed, he had converted a number of 520's to 44mag, 45 colt etc. To add to that they fit the same holsters, the grips are the same . Just got rid of a model 27 , in the safe resides a 629 power port, and a 625 mountain gun. No Smith can take the abuse that a Ruger can take but I have a good friend that has a 28 he carried on duty for years that has been rebuilt 2 times and has well over 100,000 rounds down range. Still in great shape. If you want as close to indestructible, Redhawk in .357.
Only one! That ain't right! I've got a few, but a k-frame fits me just right. I've got a beat up S&W 65 - love it. For just a .38 - Model 10. Perfection.Only one I have. 19-4 Nickel P&R 4”. I’ve thought about selling it though. More of a semi guy nowadays.