BuzzinSATX
Well-Known
BuzzinSATX.,
YEP the "pl@stic b@st@rd" are "recognized worldwide for their reliability & performance" UNTIL/UNLESS you are the unfortunate person that one blows up on & seriously wounds or kills. = IF that happens to YOU, come back & tell me how 'wonderful, wonderful" that they are.
You may want to read/accept Post # 127 as FACT. = I was there & SAW what happened to the Postal Inspector. - He will NEVER look normal again.
yours, satx
I never said they were wonderful. And most Glock shooters, myself included, readily accept and acknowledge their shortfalls.
I won’t question your story about the Glock blowing up in the guys hand...but I will wonder what ammo the guy was using that caused such a blow up...seems pretty bad for factory, but what do I know. Just this....it was a very rare anomaly.
If Glocks blew up a tiny fraction of the time, there would be stories galore...but there aren’t. I’ve really only heard your story. If there were many stories, they would get out...and there would NOT be near the amount of military and LEO units using them as there are today, around the Globe.
Glocks are not the best guns available...not the most ergonomic, not the most accurate...not the most stylish.
But they work...well...and continue to work....dirty, under lubed, and banged around. You don’t have to like them, or even own one. But only a fool would claim so many different organization choosing the same gun for the folks they send in harms way are ALL wrong. That is simply absurdly. It’s surpassed the 1911 and BHP for use worldwide. I don’t know if it’s passed the CZ75 (and clones) design, but there is zero denial that it’s a popular and reliable firearm choice.
How in the world does that make a Glock overrated?
Again...don’t be a hater.