That's not really what happened here.But, if all it takes is you to read one negative review, how do you come to terms to buy anything from anywhere?
Or is it because its a TGT member? Gotta stay true to the comrades? That blows my mind.
Remember that restaurant manager who got fired because she refused to serve three black men unless they showed they could pay first? Everyone thought she was terrible until we all later found out that the three men were known to her. They made a habit of doing the old dine-n-dash and bragging about it on social media. The manager was rehired.
My point? Additional information about or from the person who did the alleged bad thing can make a complete difference in the way the initial report is considered reliable or not.
In this case, we had the exact opposite of the restaurant case. A complaint was made that I could easily dismiss. The OP by ml1209 sounded flat-out weird and would have been no impediment to me visiting that place in the future.
HOWEVER, we then saw the response by the owner/manager/whatever. That response spoke volumes. It was internally inconsistent. It was the type of thing that could only be written by someone who isn't particularly smart (or, at minimum, not particularly careful with their words) and is trying to cover up their own bad deeds.
The original report was an anomaly. The response to it was decisively damning.