texas_teacher
Well-Known
Interesting post. <---wish it was beer and not popcorn
Mine'd be a huge margarita...
Interesting post. <---wish it was beer and not popcorn
And you just have to hope and pray that they aim at that 4" x 2" target if it will stop bullets eh?
Your statement above is circular in nature, but I would argue if there is no tactical advantage to open carry, why is open carry even an issue?
Once again, I am not necessarily opposed to open carry. I merely believe that concealed carry provides a tactical advantage. Moreover, I believe open carry can be interpreted as overly provocative, and would negatively hurt our gun rights and protections.
In other words, concealed carry provides for our personal protection and right to bear arms.
4"! That's a big ol' badge! LOL
I think we have beat this dog to death ! MOST people get it and some .........ahhhhhh, forget it.
Wait there's a dead dog? Somebody get out the redundancy stick and beat it somemore...
I think there is a distinct tactical advantage to concealed carry... Therefore I'm a f*cking moron and will oppose open carry because I don't want to have the possibility of seeing the shit that's coming at me...
Rough guesstimate... It's what we teach fourth graders nowadays... I'm not telling a bunch of kids to go up and measure the badge emblazing a LEO's teet... Just guesstimate from a distance...
I am beginning to conclude that the mere advocation of open carry has more to do with self esteem and "wanting to be a cowboy" showing others "what you have" rather than being simply satisfied with personal protection.
Again, why advertise you are armed and dangerous? Could it be some get a "kick" to their self esteem when others know you can carry a weapon like "a police officer"...LOL
Wait there's a dead dog? Somebody get out the redundancy stick and beat it somemore...
I think there is a distinct tactical advantage to concealed carry... Therefore I'm a f*cking moron and will oppose open carry because I don't want to have the possibility of seeing the shit that's coming at me...
I have yet to read a supportive argument, besides the constitutional issue. I am open to reading such arguments for open carry.
I would like to have the right to open carry. I would still hide my weapon to an extent, but I wouldn't have to worry about printing or get paranoid when I bend over or put my arms over my head.
I have a full size handgun, and the only way I've found to conceal it well is to where it at about 5 o'clock. I don't like having my gun in the small of my back, it's a lot harder to draw, but I keep it there to properly conceal it.
If we could open carry, I'd probably wear, at 3 o'clock, a comfortable OWB holster with retention. I'd still cover it up with an untucked t-shirt, but I wouldn't have to worry about someone getting a quick glance at it and it'd be a much better way to carry.
Or you simply refuse to accept that others are able to prioritize their risk and rewards different than you.
I'd still like to see the definition of "effective". What is "effective" carry? Why is effective? And How have you determined the difference?
Until I see those answers, the arguments against OC are those of personal preference.
I'm starting to conclude antiOCers are just of opinion "I don't like it so it shouldn't be allowed".
Edit: I take that back not "..it shouldn't be allowed" but rather "I won't support it when the time comes to support it"
It is the wearer's choice as to how it is worn with open carry... If you are passionately against open carry because you like concealed then shut up because nobody is saying that you still can't conceal it...