Those suits generally argue due process was infringed. For example, company policy says three warnings before you can be terminated. Employee is terminated, but the warnings aren’t documented. Sue, win.
Sometimes but not always, believe me.
Those suits generally argue due process was infringed. For example, company policy says three warnings before you can be terminated. Employee is terminated, but the warnings aren’t documented. Sue, win.
Btw those laws don’t apply at plants
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep; that is true... In my case, office building and parking garage only...
Anything that is considered "company business" requires me to leave it at home. So any road trips to a field site (or anything that I would be reimbursed for mileage) is a "no-no".
Sometimes but not always, believe me.
I do believe you. I agree that while it’s not as simple as it sounds, once the company terminates your employer it’s an uphill climb.
Employment law is a difficult area for companies to always be in compliance with, but it’s damn hard to prove it.
Locked vehicle, locked container inside your vehicle, never consent to search, never tell anyone you have a firearm in the locked container inside your locked vehicle.....
I'm a contractor at a company where firearms in vehicles is prohibited (by employee guidelines) and they perform random vehicle searches. The searches are not entirely about weapons, they're also for catching anyone taking equipment out of the building without permission.
I'm a contractor at a company where firearms in vehicles is prohibited (by employee guidelines) and they perform random vehicle searches. The searches are not entirely about weapons, they're also for catching anyone taking equipment out of the building without permission.
You obviously do not understand "employment at will". The employer doesn't need any reason in order to decide to fire you in such a situation. If they find you had a firearm in your vehicle, they will just exercise their option of firing you BECAUSE, and state no reason at all.I'm not fully understanding this statement. if the state law allows guns in vehicles in employee parking lots how can a company fire an individual for that? Does the law not afford any personal protection from employers? i.e. the state doesn't care and leaves it 100% to employer policy? If that's the case why even waste paper on a toothless law?
I'm pretty certain one of them involves working in the oil field . . .There are exceptions. I don't remember them all, but it seems like 3 or 4 exceptions.
or perzactly.You mean like "ed zachary"...