That's a level of thread derailment that I don't think this thread can withstand.1960’s “Cuban Missile Crisis” was another orchestrated FRAUD
Really? Proof?
That's a level of thread derailment that I don't think this thread can withstand.1960’s “Cuban Missile Crisis” was another orchestrated FRAUD
Really? Proof?
<>1960’s “Cuban Missile Crisis” was another orchestrated FRAUD
Really? Proof?
Sorry, I didn’t see this until after I replied.That's a level of thread derailment that I don't think this thread can withstand.
No worries. I just don't want to see this thread get locked again but it seems to be constantly pushing in that direction.Sorry, I didn’t see this until after I replied.
I especially liked "I" and my experts" !
Narcissism knows no boundaries.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Sigh.<>
“Proof?”
How about you doing your OWN “research”.
A “deal” was agreed to in private before JFK’s famous “speech”, which allowed him to save-face; but the Soviets never left Cuba until Reagan.
Bobby Kennedy torpedo’d the “Bay of Pigs” invasion, and betrayed all those Cuban patriots on the beach there.
The Soviets “won”.
The entire Kennedy bunch, excepting Joe, Jr., were arrogant creeps ! (My studied opinion.)
Can you say Chappaquiddick?
leVieux
<>
“Proof?”
How about you doing your OWN “research”.
We are all guilty of going off in the weeds at times. It's almost a TGT Doctrine of posting. Lol.No worries. I just don't want to see this thread get locked again but it seems to be constantly pushing in that direction.
I generally trust my primary sources because they have proven to be very accurate since the first few weeks of the war and because I have some contacts on the ground there I hear from from time to time that confirm what I hear other place.Once again, I half way agree with you. But you realize that you just pointed out that Russia has more that they can use than what they currently are using right? why do you think that the people you’re listening to who didn’t have a clear picture before suddenly do? You realize that ukraine is also relying on conscripts right? And that sending out people with very little, if any training due to their heavy losses has been a major problem for them for quite some time right?
<>In other words, "I got no proof, but I think I have special knowledge"...
I doubt the Ukrainian conscripts would agree with you on that. Getting back to the original point though, you know that Russia has plenty more to throw into this if they actually wanted to, which makes that coup that some here have been hoping for dangerous to ukraine.I generally trust my primary sources because they have proven to be very accurate since the first few weeks of the war and because I have some contacts on the ground there I hear from from time to time that confirm what I hear other place.
The issue of training is a big one and one I have first hand knowledge of. Adequate training is a huge issue for any full scale war, but again Ukraine has been able to get many of their troops rotated through various training centers. It's not the level or type of training an American military would be used to, but it covers the basics of tactics and the dos-and-donts of combat.
Sent from my SM-S918U1 using Tapatalk
Maybe, but it's not top line stuff. 1st they started dragging tanks out of museums to replace all the modern tanks they lost.Russia has plenty more to throw into this if they actually wanted to
<>
Zod,
Do you really think I get my geopolitical information from TGT ?
<>
Quite sure the experts speak with you, no not to you, with you while counting flowers on the wall.<>
Zod,
Do you really think I get my geopolitical information from TGT ?
<>
<>Would you care to point out anywhere I suggested that you do?
But throwing out outrageous claims, then when asked for proof declaring "Look it up yourself!" is a classic Internet cop-out mostly used by crackpots. Still, this isn't the thread for opening up conspiracy theories in this hemisphere - there's plenty being propagated about Europe.