Hey now that's a good idea! And if they won't do it... there's always another Roy Epps.
We All Hang Together or We All Hang Separately. This Guy Gets It in Spades
- Thread starter Hoji
- Start date
The #1 community for Gun Owners in Texas
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Yes they said they would do a caucus. This of course misses the entire point as if it is not overturned, he is not on the November ballot, so the caucus is meaningless.
It must be overturned or another dozen states will do it also. Good news is they will all be BLUE states, so no electoral votes lost.
Last edited:
First of all, ballots for a primary are printed out long before a general. The primary determines who is placed on a general ballot for certain parties. If the ballots aren't printed for a primary, a caucus can be made by the party that has no ballot. Meaning a vote is held within the states party, not that I trust the GOP.
Second, one can argue a primary is a state issue, not federal. A general presidential election, on the other hand, is federal.
While I do hope SCOTUS nips it in the bud with a favorable decision, I wouldn't put it past them not to on the primary.
No, that is not definitive. The Colorado Supreme Court put a stay on it until they hear from SCOTUS.
Hang on. Look at the second sentence in that. "If review is sought...before the stay expires, the stay remains in place." Are you kidding me? This whole thing is toothless. The Supreme Court doesn't even have to look at this for Trump to stay on the ballot. Soon as the appeal is filed (review is sought) it's moot.
Am I reading it wrong? If I'm right then whoever crafted this knew what they were doing and this only a Judicial political stunt.
And, imo, that is more dangerous than the substance of the decision.
Last edited:
Yes. that is my point - action has to taken or his name will not be on the ballot.Hang on. Look at the second sentence in that. "If review is sought...before the stay expires, the stay remains in place." Are you kidding me? This whole thing is toothless. The Supreme Court doesn't even have to look at this for Trump to stay on the ballot. Soon as the appeal is filed (review is sought) it's moot.
Am I reading it wrong? If I'm right then whoever crafted this knew what they were doing and this only a Judicial political stunt.
And, imo, that is more dangerous than the substance of the decision.
Lonesome Dove
A man of vision but with no mission.
I'm quite sure there are no real Republicans left in Colorado. So no loss to anyone.
<>
I’m hoping that Trump, twice burned (once by COVID hoax, twice by election FRAUD), has several alternate plans for next year.
Remember that b/f becoming President, he was the Master Negotiator.
I often wonder if the deSantis/Trump feud is just theater to throw his enemies off ?
leVieux
<>
I’m hoping that Trump, twice burned (once by COVID hoax, twice by election FRAUD), has several alternate plans for next year.
Remember that b/f becoming President, he was the Master Negotiator.
I often wonder if the deSantis/Trump feud is just theater to throw his enemies off ?
leVieux
<>
<>
We must prepare a very powerful alternative to the deep state’s either delaying or cheating again; and the Citizenry must be made aware of it !
Our Constitution must be saved NOW !
The only alternative is submission to genocide and perpetual slavery.
leVieux
<>
No, it's just the opposite. Per the second sentence on page 9 of the Colorado decision, all that needs to occur is for an Appeal to be filed before Jan 4th for the stay to be continued until the SC rules. If the SC doesn't review or rule - the stay continues, and Trump stays on the ballot.
Please, one of you legal eagles, am I mistaken?
It's happened before.
@ronbwolf - what say you?
<>
BUT,
is that just part of a ploy; or has he been driven mad ?
We are all Human & frail !
I’m pretty sure, after being tricked twice, that he now has alternatives in place.
Trump is 76, we all age and weaken as we age; I KNOW this first-hand.
&
We all underestimated the pure EVIL behind both GHB and BHO, much less Old Joe.
Schwab & his WEF are the continuation of NAZI-ism, now ‘’on steroids’’ & with high-tech !
Who among us could have predicted a union of communism and NAZI-style socialism in 21st Century America?
<?>
Last edited:
They didn't go to the trouble of stealing the election and doing everything they can full speed to wreck the country just to let a half way fair election return the POTUS office back to the people
No.no..they are not letting that power go without a fight
Alex Jones made a prediction while being interviewed by Tucker last week that neither Trump or Biden would be on the Ballot
But I'm still thinking there may not even be an election by then
