Lawful in fact does mean "not a crime". The very definition of a crime is an act which is unlawful. Something lawful cannot then be a crime.
I would really enjoy you explain how you can reach your conclusion.
Sent from your mom's house using Tapatalk
But laws can conflict. If the 2A says our rights shall not be infringed, and one of us chooses to “bear” in a manner in conflict with the Penal Code, could not a jury determine that the code was in fact wrong, and a civilian who allegedly “resisted” was in fact within his rights? The cop might be “lawful” under the Penal Code, but is in fact infringing on the natural and Constitutional rights of the citizen.