Trumpf can go F himself.

[Mowingmaniac 24/7]

Sasquatch,

ab will never disavow their corporate religion of d.e.i.....thus all who expect they'll ever apologize to their core bl drinker-ship for the super faggot they had pretending to be female, while flogging bl is never/ever going to happen.

Besides, ab fking hates their normal everyday consumers in favor of perverts of every stripe...

 

[Sasquatch]

Sasquatch,

ab will never disavow their corporate religion of d.e.i.....thus all who expect they'll ever apologize to their core bl drinker-ship for the super faggot they had pretending to be female, while flogging bl is never/ever going to happen.

Besides, ab fking hates their normal everyday consumers in favor of perverts of every stripe...

AB is German after all, right? They're always into the weird shit.

 

[General Zod]

AB is German after all, right? They're always into the weird shit.

 

[Texasgordo]

AB is German after all, right? They're always into the weird shit.

 

[oldag]

Grow up, man. You're acting like a Democrat.

Funny guy.

 

[Axxe55]

I talk pretty bad ass in person, too.

When I'm behind the keyboard, I can use punctuation and control my caps lock key.

When you have good information to share, it's worth making legible. That's not a problem for you, I see.

your're just another internet arshole talking shit trying to convince yourself you're a badass talk is cheap

 

[Texasgordo]

your're just another internet arshole

Yeah I'm here

 

[WT_Foxtrot]

And won't be the last, I am sure.

If I wanted to spend the time, I could go back and pick editorials that reference their staunch defense of the 1A, 2A. Their stern criticism of woke, DEI, ESG, anti-semitism, etc. Hardly liberal positions.

But as is typical, if someone doesn't like every single thing another says - well then the other person is labeled liberal, Democrat, RINO, etc.

But he's right.....and their support for the border bill at this time, which does zero to stem the flood and ruining our country, speaks absolute volumes.

 

[Dawico]

your're just another internet arshole talking shit trying to convince yourself you're a badass talk is cheap

Bless your heart.

 

[oldag]

But he's right.....and their support for the border bill at this time, which does zero to stem the flood and ruining our country, speaks absolute volumes.

Thanks for making my point.

 

[WT_Foxtrot]

Thanks for making my point.

So your point is that the conservative position is open borders and ruination of the country? Wow. Please explain.

 

[cycleguy2300]

So your point is that the conservative position is open borders and ruination of the country? Wow. Please explain.

Conservative? NO.

Republican? Maybe...

The Republican party has all too often "lost with dignity" as Rush used to say. They were happy to end up at democrat's positions, it just took a few years, but in the end it was "destroy America" and "destroy America slower" until we got Trump and actually made headway BACK towards some of the constitutional foundations of our nation. However flawed and imperfect the journey was look at the Justices he appointed and what they have done for 2a and stoping fetal violence, what Trump policies for the economy and jobs...

I dont gaf about bud light or coors or beer in general. Has Bud Light dumped the wokeness? If they have they do deserve a second chance.


Sent from my SM-S918B using Tapatalk

 

[oldag]

So your point is that the conservative position is open borders and ruination of the country? Wow. Please explain.

The point is that some people today disagree on one point, and based on that one point the person/paper/organization they disagree with is wholly condemned.

As human beings, we will never agree with anyone on EVERYTHING. But when we agree on most things, we should not wholly condemn the other. This is my point. I do not know how to explain it any simpler.

As I pointed out the WSJ editorial board has taken the following stands (as anyone who ACTUALLY READS IT will know):

• Strong 2A stance
• Strong 1A stance
• Against government agencies having unrestricted power and usurping legislative authority (think ATF, EPA, IRS, etc.)
• Pro U.S. military
• Anti-woke
• Anti-ESG
• Anti-DEI
• Points out the danger in the global warming cult drive, in terms of cost to people and instability of the grid
• Points out hypocrisy of global warming elites
• Hypocrisy of charging Trump for offenses liberals commit while not being charged
• Supports SCOTUS justices who believe in the Constitution as it was written

And I could go on and on.

If this list does not sound conservative, then I don't know what is.

On the border bill, they felt that making some progress on the border was better than none. I may or may not agree with that. But based on that alone (especially when the above list is taken into account) I would not label them liberal. And no person thinking rationally would.

 

[TipBledsoe]

The comments y’all made have helped me think through my initial knee-jerk and at this point I’ll be casting my ballot for DJT.

There are the important things and the not so important things. And Trump has the right position on the important things.

 

[kbaxter60]

There are the important things and the not so important things. And Trump has the right position on the important things.

Exactly. And he performed already to support that.
Disclaimer for the orange man crowd:
He is not perfect and I am no "Trump worshipper"

 

[JoyJack]

your're just another internet arshole talking shit trying to convince yourself you're a badass talk is cheap

C'mon man, give it a rest.

 

[leVieux]

Trump: Conservatives should give Bud Light ‘a second chance’

Former President Trump urged his followers to give Anheuser-Busch a “second chance” after months of criticism the company has faced from conservatives. “The Bud Light ad was a mis…

thehill.com

<>

He should have stayed out of that.

’Let sleeping dogs lie”” !

<>

 

[1911'S 4 Me]

Is there any one on earth that is perfect in every way?
Some of you seem to think you are.

 

[oldag]

The comments y’all made have helped me think through my initial knee-jerk and at this point I’ll be casting my ballot for DJT.

There are the important things and the not so important things. And Trump has the right position on the important things.

It will be either Trump or Biden. And that is a no brainer (pun intended), Trump gets the vote.

 

[Grumps21]

The point is that some people today disagree on one point, and based on that one point the person/paper/organization they disagree with is wholly condemned.

As human beings, we will never agree with anyone on EVERYTHING. But when we agree on most things, we should not wholly condemn the other. This is my point. I do not know how to explain it any simpler.

As I pointed out the WSJ editorial board has taken the following stands (as anyone who ACTUALLY READS IT will know):

• Strong 2A stance
• Strong 1A stance
• Against government agencies having unrestricted power and usurping legislative authority (think ATF, EPA, IRS, etc.)
• Pro U.S. military
• Anti-woke
• Anti-ESG
• Anti-DEI
• Points out the danger in the global warming cult drive, in terms of cost to people and instability of the grid
• Points out hypocrisy of global warming elites
• Hypocrisy of charging Trump for offenses liberals commit while not being charged
• Supports SCOTUS justices who believe in the Constitution as it was written

And I could go on and on.

If this list does not sound conservative, then I don't know what is.

On the border bill, they felt that making some progress on the border was better than none. I may or may not agree with that. But based on that alone (especially when the above list is taken into account) I would not label them liberal. And no person thinking rationally would.

I agree on the conservative points, but any “progress” is full of loopholes and ineffective. All Biden needs to do is put back all of the Trump EO that he nullified. The solution is there. The fact that they offered to throttle the illegals to 5k per day tell me that they have the ability, but they close not to. IMO this should be non-negotiable