I guess he figured he had less to learn than his students.
His students deserve better.
sent from an idgit coffeeholic
Zing! Dead center!
I guess he figured he had less to learn than his students.
His students deserve better.
sent from an idgit coffeeholic
I'll bite.
Leave off everything except "please keep your CHL status to yourself" or however you choose to word it.
Nothing else is really enforceable. It's already illegal to intentionally display a firearm for show and tell, campus carry won't change that. Saying it as if it is your policy will give the impression that you don't understand the law. No reason to state what CHL holders already know.
The rest about pretending firearms don't exist, it's just silly. Saying "anything else is a situation" could be interpreted as a veiled threat. Could make students feel as if that knowledge could unfairly effect their grades which would cause issues for the school.
Also, accidental or "negligent" exposure as you like to call it is also not illegal. The law states clearly that accidental exposure is not a crime. If you notice a shirt has ridden up, politely inform the person and they will fix it, and probably be a bit embarrassed.
Aside from that, just relax. You won't know who your CHL holders are anyways unless they have students who are curious about the application process and you overhear the conversation.
One more thing, "printing" isn't illegal. Plain view is illegal, but printing (seeing the outline of the gun through clothing) is not.
I feel I've given a good fair answer and would hope you might return the kindness.
Do you own or have experience with firearms?
Sent from my HAL 9000
Right on!I'm a college professor. Guess what verbiage will be in my syllabus .... none.
Doesn't make any sense. It's almost the same a having a dress code in my syllabus.
Too many professors view the classroom as a fiefdom. It's easier to have fewer rules than it is to invent scenarios that might need 'a rule' to resolve.
TRG
I wish more people could grasp this concept...It's easier to have fewer rules than it is to invent scenarios that might need 'a rule' to resolve.
They are either so emotionally twisted that they are blind to reason, or they genuinely want a disarmed populous for totalitarian reasons.This is truly a question I have. I don't understand how anyone can be so blind. There are things in politics that I don't agree with, but I at least understand where the opposition is coming from. But I don't see where anti gun people are coming from.
I truly don't understand anti gun advocates. Do they not understand statistics. The more guns are restricted the high the crime rate goes up, look at Chicago or DC. Look at crime rates of CHL holders.
This is truly a question I have. I don't understand how anyone can be so blind. There are things in politics that I don't agree with, but I at least understand where the opposition is coming from. But I don't see where anti gun people are coming from.