I agree, but that isn't what he said.If he meant that none of the currently proposed fixes would have stopped these incidents, then I believe he is probably correct.
I agree, but that isn't what he said.If he meant that none of the currently proposed fixes would have stopped these incidents, then I believe he is probably correct.
Yes, I meant the last two without going through history. I understand many are stolen as well.Define "All of these shooters", cause I don't believe that is a correct statement. Did the Columbine shooters obtain their guns legally? And did the Sandy Hook shooter? Unless I am mistaken, I don't believe either did.
I am more confused now.Yes, I meant the last two without going through history. I understand many are stolen as well.
I will edit my comment because that was my point. I edited another part that was supposed to be at the end of second paragraph but I mistakenly put in the first for some dumb reason.
...
Also, it is what I said and confirmed in the third paragraph but I changed the first:
Haha, I'm not sure what you're asking?I am more confused now.
Who's on first?
Who's on first, what's on second, and I don't know is on third.I don't know's on third.............
https://s16-us2.startpage.com/cgi-bin/serveimage?url=https://clarityofsignal.files.wordpress.com/2017/11/screen-shot-2017-11-11-at-10-05-21-pm.png?w=680&sp=f882c03e16810efe2e6666e2546780c5&anticache=999271This from the people who demonized McCain.
Let's hope that there isn't too many that don't vote on the right, because that unpleasantness may be upon us sooner than you expect.Who's on first, what's on second, and I don't know is on third.
On topic, MY choice depends on what President Trump actually does. He often says one thing, sounding like he will cave in to the dems on something and then reverse himself and do the right thing. My bottom line is if he signs a law requiring background checks on private sales between private individuals, I will not vote for him, or anyone. I will be through voting, period. If this happens, it is just a matter of time before a great deal of 'unpleasantness'.
Funny you mention that, what was the last thing he threatened to ban? Sorry, the trust is at arms length. No, he didn't do it through executive order, but I don't see any limits at this point.Have any of the mass shooting incidents involved suppressors?
Consider, threaten.Fake news, he didn't threaten to ban suppressors, when asked he said he would consider a ban. That's not threatening.
Think about your above post if you end up not voting for Trump.For those of you who were thinking about voting for Pocahontas, she just released a new proposal on guns that may interest you-
https://www.dailywire.com/news/50496/warren-releases-massive-gun-control-plan-includes-frank-camp
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/elizabeth-warren-taxes-nra-investigation-gun-control?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed: foxnews/politics (Internal - Politics - Text)