2A is absolute? In what regard? Where does the 2A argue method of bearing arms? Where does the 2A argue the right to chose how we "bear" arms?
Right at the end. It's that not infringing part.
2A is absolute? In what regard? Where does the 2A argue method of bearing arms? Where does the 2A argue the right to chose how we "bear" arms?
No, actually its not. yet when asked about who these "state firearms directors" are you clam up and say that you dont want to talk about them.....
your bluff got called. you loose.
Again, where does the 2A argue method of bearing arms? Where does the 2A argue the right to choose how we "bear" arms? You are beginning to behave like a few others on this site, in that you "run" from answering the question(s) posed.
This> You are talking about public officials who have their numbers available via google,
Dont be lazy, use it.
at your request, i have been looking....cant find a state with an official who has the title "State Firearms Director"....
still looking though.
Im not giving it to ya. You cant google the director, they have to transfer you to him!at your request, i have been looking....cant find a state with an official who has the title "State Firearms Director"....
still looking though.
Im not giving it to ya. You cant google the director, they have to transfer you to him!
Do like I said and google the choice states firearms licensing.
Right at the end. It's that not infringing part.
or maybe, like others on this site, he has answered them a dozen times already and you are ignoring the answers
at your request, i have been looking....cant find a state with an official who has the title "State Firearms Director"....
still looking though.
Again, this is really too easy. I was hoping for much better.
How is my right to bear arms being infringed when I can CC? Again, where I can CC is infringement. Where does it say in the 2A that denying OC is an infringement on my right to bear arms? Again, am I not bearing arms when I CC? Platitude by simply writing the word "infringement" over and over again does not support your argument, no matter how often you state it.
What if State law allowed you to carry a handgun openly, but not concealed. Do you think that would be an infringement?
“The highest patriotism is not a blind acceptance of official policy, but a love of one's country deep enough to call her to a higher plain” George McGovern
How can you not love your country enough to call her standards of rights and freedoms to a higher plain and still call yourself a patriot?
No - based on the same premise - that the 2A does not specify/address the method of bearing arms.
Well at least you are consistent.
Lets take it to an extreme. You say the methods we use to bear arms can be restricted without infringing our "right to bear arms". What if the State decides the only legal method to carry your handgun is in front of you in a tactical wheelbarrow? Would you see that as an infringement on our right to bear arms?
We have the freedom of how we carry a gun in our homes.... where do we get that freedom\right from? It's not the government who gives us permission to do so it's our freedoms and rights given to us in the constitution of life liberty and justice including those specifically enumerated in the bill of rights under the 2nd amendment.No - based on the same premise - that the 2A does not specify/address the method of bearing arms.
That was stupid but I eventually expected it. The word is "reasonable". Let's look at the words "bear arms". I think a handgun in a tactical wheelbarrow would not meet the definition of "bear arms". This quote exemplifies that stupidity is the last resort when one has been "checkmated". I am really disappointed in you but you are not the first, and nor will you be the last.
However, on second thought, the wheelbarrow may meet the "keep" concept.