Text in russian:
28.06.2009 at 04.00 I was returning home from the city center. Was on foot, because money for a taxi and gave the friend did not notice that the more money I do not. Was absolutely sober, because the morning I had to carry a five-month son to massage clinic. I do not drink. That evening I drank 1 bottle of non-alcoholic beer. Passing stop Red Square, with the phrase "a UEFA trifles?" I was approached by a young man standing next to the company. There were three. All were obviously drunk, and confirmed that the examination of blood (0.98 ppm). In response, I just sent them, so how to deal with drunken bodies dark night there was not a desire. The three moved toward me. I was scared, ran from them to flee. After running a few meters, I tripped and fell (on me were new shoes, which are not allowed to run). Immediately, I felt like I started hitting on the head. Strikes were frequent and focused in the head. I tried to hide behind her hands. Realizing that just kill me now, I'm scared for my life. From blows I had little idea what was happening. Continuing to lie down and get kicked in the head, according to article 37 of the Criminal Code, I grabbed the possession of my lawful self-defense weapon - a gun traumatic Grand Power T10 and completely without aiming fired several shots into the air. Then I did not know what got into one of the attackers. The blows stopped, someone shouted, "He has a barrel!". I quickly jumped up and ran across the road, continuing to fire into the air, that would attract people's attention. After crossing the road, the attackers caught up with me, knocked on the lawn and began to continue to beat while trying to take away the gun. Realizing that the gun is another bullet, and the drunken attackers clearly inadequate, I decided that they can use my gun against me, I made the last shot in the air. More from blows received I began to lose consciousness. One of the attackers said that I had shot one of them, and for this they would kill me.
I lost consciousness. I came when it was already light. I lay on the lawn around it was a lot of people, police and ambulance. I roused the PSB officer, handcuffed and held in the car. When I was sitting there, the door was opened by a man in civilian clothes with the documents (he interviewed people stationed there), said, "You Th, cowboy?" And hit me in the face. By car, where I sat, a man came fifty years and left his phone number. One of the policemen said to another, it is a taxi driver, and he saw it all.
At 05.30 I was taken to DCH OM-7 railway district of Krasnoyarsk. There I took all the things I have, including cloak. Later, never returning my belt and holster (they are not material evidence in a criminal case). They were simply stolen.
In the bullpen, I spent 16 hours (until 21.00). There is often visited people in civilian clothes and threatened me. I was bad, her whole face was covered in blood, I was nauseated, my head was smashed and dizzy. Later forensic examination showed that I had a brain contusion and concussion adnexa of the right eye and termed it as moderate injuries. At my request to take me to the doctor, I replied that now I am going to beat if I did not stop talking.
Later in the questioning forced me to write a sincere confession. To my question, what is recognized, I answered, in that I shot. Although I do not deny it. The investigator said. What if I do not confess, I was always sent to prison for eight years, and if I confess, it will give a suspended sentence, because I have two young children.
When I was released from remand prison under recognizance not to leave, I went to the DCH written statement to the attackers. The investigator said that I do not do that, because still neither of which would not, because I have absolutely no battery (it is apparently quite noticed my face and smashed his head swollen to the size exceeding the average statistical as well as blue hands, which I covered my head). Write an application and receiving direction on the forensic examination, I went to an emergency station and then to the very examination. I passed out-patient treatment with a diagnosis of "concussion". A week later, feeling the deterioration, I was taken to a hospital emergency ambulance. At the hospital, the investigator conducted a confrontation with the attackers, in which I was, where he was trying to please and is actively interested in his health.
The investigation had been conducted many interviews and confrontations. Two of the three assailants recognized witnesses, one of the victims. These so-called witnesses consistently lied, saying that I was drunk and was the first to accost him and asked an absurd question, "Che and give you a trifle?", Followed by the words "right now ladies!" Began to deliver aimed fire on them. They insisted that they did not beat me. All this is contradicted by the lead examinations, which says that I have inflicted heavy blows with a blunt object (probably down), just says that the wound channel by the attacker, whom I was going upward and the inlet to 5 cm below the navel. How could I make such a wound by shooting while standing? I was shooting prone, when they beat me and that is why he wound channel is bottom up.
All these facts were not taken into account by the investigator Demidova EK And only the lies of the assailants (witnesses) was taken into account.
When I received the call to another confrontation, this time with a taxi driver, I was delighted and decided that he now clarify the situation, I came again to the OM-7. Entering the investigator's office, I asked where the taxi driver. The investigator pointed to a young guy in shorts and a T-shirt, which was full of tattooed, 28-years. A healthy strong young man. This was not the taxi driver who approached the police car and left his position, he was a little puny little man age 50. This guy I never saw it. At the confrontation, he pressed on me, saying that I need to shoot, and he expressed himself with the elements of prison slang. He got mixed up in the testimony, he saw how I first came and started shooting, he said he was generally not interested in what happens around and he did something never seen, but only saw what happened after the shooting. So he also claimed that I was not who it beat. How do I explain the beatings he could not.
The other day I was sitting in the investigator's office and got acquainted with the examinations, signed protocols review. Investigator constantly write and get on the phone SMS. And as if by accident, said the lawyer, that now comes the father of the wounded assailant (so-called victim) that would know the case. I wonder on what grounds he was acquainted with the criminal case? Investigator, apparently delaying my presence in her room, waited for his father's "victim". She invited me to go into the hallway and talk to him, because now I have a hard question sbavlenii period, and an acquittal by a court there can be no question. I went out. Without saying a word, I waited for that this man will ask me not to plant his son. But he told me, 'What do you bore me with her eyes? There Th say - say. I am a busy person and I have no time hanging around here. "After receiving my answer that I have nothing to say and what I thought it was he wanted me to say something, he turned and walked away. It is unclear why he came to know the case, but because very busy, he immediately left. My wife met him in the yard of OM-7, and asked him if he does not understand that puts an innocent man? To which he replied that not only that Litvinov was not recognized, so still and wants to put his son.
The conclusion from this performance: the investigator actively talking to "victims" and his father. It is obvious that the investigator has a personal and perhaps selfish interest in this matter, because his father was "the victim" director and co-owner of a large firm "TerminalNefteGaz"
The same investigator Demidova casually SHAREHOLDERS 'phrase, that it was pulled from the investigation department calls seeking, in particular some of Belkin. Also, she said that the prosecutor himself area Bauer took the case under his personal control and I just shines a maximum, because Attorney Bauer countryman and friend of my father "victim". Another investigator Demidova EK repeatedly said that many associate with the three assailants and well knows, and they could not attack first, because they are all from affluent families, and the money not needed.
In next Monday at 9.00 am I was summoned by my lawyer and said that today I was charged for st.111 Part 1 of the Criminal Code. The investigator told him that if I did not write a confession, it will seat me today. If you write, then I subscribed to by the court.
This he said to me over 5 hours to charge. As he himself said, this conversation he held with investigators last Friday, immediately after my acquaintance with the examinations. Why did not he tell me about this on Friday, but only now? After all, I would have time to think, to weigh everything ...
Also that Friday, when I read the examination of "victim" I found it a fact "the direction of the wound channel from the bottom up." This lawyer has not seen, and heard from me, when we left the building OM-7. The conclusion is clear: a lawyer working on the "injured". He just put me before the fact: Confess or sit down.
That same morning, I refused this counsel and hired another. Everything happened as the first lawyer said. As soon as I signed the charge on st.111 p.1 me handcuffed and sent to a detention center, where I spent two days and became ill with bronchitis.
They put me in the first chamber, where sat two other men from jail. They told me that at night they will put me into the second chamber. There, in the chamber I will be compelled to write to appear, because second chamber "working" and in it on a permanent basis are people out of prison and working on the investigation, using illegal methods in obtaining confessions.
In the evening, when all the inhabitants of the first chamber was taken back to jail, the duty forced me to wash the floors and walls in the IVS, what gave me tea and sugar. After cleaning has sent me to the second chamber. Fear no bounds. Second camera was habitable, well-groomed. There was a kettle, a cell phone and other benefits of civilization. But there was a second camera surveillance cameras, which were in all four chambers of the IVS. At the reception desk on the monitor showing the image from all four cameras simultaneously, and the second too. But the image of the second chamber was lime, there were people who were in the second row there.
In the second row all was quiet, I was fortunately not hit, just ask how and why I came here. There I spent the night. The same investigator Demidova EK intentionally did not tell me to transfer from his wife.
One morning I was taken to the court as to prevent, where I was released under a subscription, because two months before I have always been at all investigative actions, not hiding and not interfere with the investigation. On another issue to the magistrate judge that it all still is the basis for my opinion in jail, the investigator said, "Well he's not recognized!". So, apparently investigator Demidova E.K to many accustomed to such methods of work that considers a normal person put in jail, what would it presanut and gain recognition.
Immediately after the trial, in a building, the investigator began to threaten me that I still sit in jail, that she has the resources to do so. When I tried to get into the car and go over things in the IVS, the investigator said that she would not let me on the court she "did not care." The operatives, who escorted me from the detention center pending trial were let me sit in his car and leave, they kept the doors and threatened. This whole circus took place in five meters from the entrance to the courthouse. Slamming the door of his car, I went back to the IVS OM-7 to sign papers and pick up their belongings.
By signing the IVS paper, I went into the office to the investigator Demidova EK, that would sign the recognizance not to leave. After signing the two copies (my hands were never given any), the investigator gave me sign a paper to cancel the first subscription, which was dated July 6, 2009 (the yard was August 19, 2009). I refused to sign a paper in retrospect, what she said that I will sign it or go back to the IVS. I took the paper, tried to get up to go into the hall to consult with a lawyer. Investigator Demidova EK, despite its impressive size, jumping over the table, grabbed the paper, tore it and threw in the urn. I left the office, the investigator came after me and called my wife in for questioning and then attach it in the case as proof of my guilt. During the interrogation, she tried to convince my wife, so she persuaded me to write a confession, otherwise the term will be more.
A couple of days Demidova EK again called me up and gave to sign a new charge. It has downgraded it to Part 2 st.111.
In my statement I was denied. Investigator Demidova EK substantiated by the fact that I received the injuries were inflicted during arrest me after I committed my felony. These injuries are comparable with the severity of the crime. However, it also took into account the testimony of witnesses who said that I was not beaten. So do not beat or beaten?
So she did not take into account alcohol intoxication attackers. At my request to conduct examination of blood in my day detention, I was denied because it was obvious that I was completely sober. But the investigator Demidova EK wrote in a false accusation, she pointed out that I was so drunk that he could not speak.
Investigator Demidova EK did not take into account the direction of the wound channel in the wounded, which confirms my words that I shot, lying down, when I was wounded, while the attackers, witnesses claimed that I shot while standing at a distance of two meters aiming. The same investigator absolutely no attempt to find out how I had suffered injuries.
Me was hired a private detective who found that near the site of accidents is the bank VTB, which has CCTV cameras, which recorded the events, but the records are stored for only 4 weeks and have long since been destroyed. Why did not the investigator Demidov has made these records in the matter? Or is it simply did not conduct investigative actions in interviewing potential witnesses, which speaks of her incompetence or her interest in the outcome of the case.
Thus, I did the accused, while the offender to shield his influential father, who has money and connections. I believe that the accusation brought against me illegally and is intended to save the attackers from prosecution. I acted in full accordance with article 37 of the Criminal Code.
Please look into this case and to retrain article on article 37 of the Criminal Code and to close for lack of evidence. I ask just to test for investigator Demidova EK for a bribe from the director of the firm "TerminalNefteGaz" Korovyakina Victor. I ask to verify the legality of investigative actions of the investigator Demidova EK
Criminal case number 19051323 is directed to the railway Court of Krasnoyarsk.
WOW! That sounds rough. Good luck with all that man. Thanks for the translation Acetone.
Sounded like a police report anyway.No problem, but it should be taken with a grain of salt...after all it is google.
Acetone, so much mistakes in this text 0_o
Acetone, so much mistakes in this text 0_o