The question was does anyone still shoot it. I don't think putting 20 rounds a year through it for mandatory qualifying countsCame across a Harris County Deputy today carrying a Sig P320 in 40.
The question was does anyone still shoot it. I don't think putting 20 rounds a year through it for mandatory qualifying counts
Nothing wrong with a .40. Good round. Just because it's not used by LE does not mean it's not a good round.
I didn't say there wasn't a difference, I just said the difference was minimal.If there is more energy, wouldn't more damage be logical?
It does deliver more energy than a 9mm, but I think the difference in terms of human tissue damage from hollow points is minimal. Shot placement is obviously more important. As for range shooting, I don't see the point of a 40. I shoot 9mm if I'm practicing accuracy and if really want to shoot a bigger caliber, I'll pick the 45 acp.
What brands exactly? Out of all my 9mm (I own quite a few), I've yet to encounter a malfunction with any of them shooting factory new ammunition. The brands I use are Blazer Brass (I no longer shoot these), Fiocchi, Sellier&Bellot, and Magtech. For self defense I've tested about 200 - 300 rounds of federal premium 124 gr standard pressure, have yet to experience any issues whatsoever.One thing about 40 that I have experienced over the years, is I have never had an ammo induced problem with my 40 handguns. However, with 9mm I have had several handguns over the years that did not run good and/or had ejection issues with certain brands of 9mm ammo.
Yep.One thing about 40 that I have experienced over the years, is I have never had an ammo induced problem with my 40 handguns. However, with 9mm I have had several handguns over the years that did not run good and/or had ejection issues with certain brands of 9mm ammo.