That certainly won't help with recruiting, if potential applicants don't think their forced-to-join union is going to represent them if they wind up in a similar scenario. If this guy gets acquitted, he's still looking at maybe a million bucks in legal fees.
So, heard on the news today the vehicle was stolen. Caught he tail end of news report, so not sure if it was this incident or another.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you. Got a link for that, by a chance?So, heard on the news today the vehicle was stolen. Caught he tail end of news report, so not sure if it was this incident or another.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thank you. Got a link for that, by a chance?
Been waiting on the truth to come out. All these libtards on the news providing only one-sided reporting. As if the teen were a saint. I had a hunch that he just might not be. They've been trying to hide everything about the suspect very hard. But it will eventually leak out.
Probable cause is needed for an arrest.From what I understand, the car was NOT the one that fled from the officer before, and it was NOT stolen. The kid was just minding his own business doing nothing wrong, legitimately. The ex-officer didn't run the tag, he just thought it looked like the car that ran from him, and he guessed that it ran because it was stolen.
He didn't have probable cause. A car just looking like a car that ran from you the day before is not a reasonable basis for believing the occupants are commiting a crime.
It was an unlawful stop.
Sent from my SM-S908U using Tapatalk
I don't think it even falls under reasonable suspicion. Just because the car looks like the one that ran from him before, doesn't mean it is. There are thousands of cars just like that one driving around. No reasonable person would think that car A and car B are the same car just because they look the same. There would need to be something else to tie the two together. Something like the license plate, that the officer didn't bother running.Probable cause is needed for an arrest.
Reasonable suspicion is what is required for a detention.
Надіслано з дому вашої мами за допомогою Tapatalk
There was no stop.…It was a bad stop…
Probably a lot of angry ranting from the angry buffaloI won't give TYT so much as a click - can you summarize what, if any, new info they have in their video that the police activity or the other breakdowns out there don't?
Probably a lot of angry ranting from the angry buffalo
It's still considered a stop. It's an investigatory stop.There was no stop.
Kid was parked at McDs. Cop show up on a call for disturbing the peace, doesn’t even make it inside the restaurant, goes directly to the vehicle in question under the assumption it was the same vehicle from day before.